<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: static doesn't work in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847911#M974171</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Change...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) G.G.G.G 192.168.10.3 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) interface 192.168.10.3 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please rate helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-30T17:52:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>static doesn't work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847910#M974170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to do a simple scenario: accessing a server at the inside. I'm using the usual trio lines (static, acl, acg) as follow:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;G= Global IP address (outside if)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;F= Foreign IP address (origine of test)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list in_outside_static extended permit ip any host G.G.G.G&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) G.G.G.G 192.168.10.3 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group in_outside_static in interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, it doesn't work...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACL is never fire up (hitcnt=0). But the log indicate:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TCP request discarded from F.F.F.F/1137 to outside:G.G.G.F/21.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: The outside interface receives his ip add by DHCP. Is static xlate has a problem with this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have an idea where to look to resolve this behavior.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using a ASA 5520 version 7.2(1)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More info: I make a packet-tracer which reveals that G.G.G.G isn't translated in phase 2 below, why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# packet-tracer input outside tcp F.F.F.F 1025 G.G.G.G$&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phase: 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type: FLOW-LOOKUP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subtype:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result: ALLOW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additional Information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Found no matching flow, creating a new flow&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phase: 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type: UN-NAT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subtype: static&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result: ALLOW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) tcp G.G.G.G ftp 192.168.10.3 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255  norandomseq&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat-control&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  match tcp inside host 192.168.10.3 eq 21 outside any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    static translation to G.G.G.G/21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additional Information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NAT divert to egress interface inside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Untranslate G.G.G.G/21 to 192.168.10.3/21 using netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phase: 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subtype: input&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result: ALLOW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additional Information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in   G.G.G.G     255.255.255.255 identity&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phase: 4&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type: ACCESS-LIST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subtype:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result: DROP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Implicit Rule&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additional Information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;input-interface: outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;input-status: up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;input-line-status: up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;output-interface: NP Identity Ifc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;output-status: up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;output-line-status: up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Action: drop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847910#M974170</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdube</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:18:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: static doesn't work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847911#M974171</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Change...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) G.G.G.G 192.168.10.3 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) interface 192.168.10.3 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please rate helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847911#M974171</guid>
      <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-30T17:52:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: static doesn't work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847912#M974172</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It was that. But G.G.G.G was the IP of the outside interface. At first hand, it looks similar but (interface) behave differently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have an explanation why "interface" behave differently of G.G.G.G, or is it just a feature by design?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:28:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847912#M974172</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdube</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-01T01:28:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: static doesn't work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847913#M974173</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, this is by design. You must use the interface keyword instead of specifying the actual IP address when you want to include the IP address of a PIX Firewall interface in a static PAT entry. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please refer the  below command reference for details.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix63/command/reference/s.html#wp1026694" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix63/command/reference/s.html#wp1026694&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;** Please rate all helpful posts **&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:49:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-doesn-t-work/m-p/847913#M974173</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajagadee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-01T01:49:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

