<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Syntax for access list object group tcp-udp in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-for-access-list-object-group-tcp-udp/m-p/825740#M974348</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even though you have both TCP and UDP Port Range defined in the Ojbject-Group called Oracle_forms, the Access-list "outside_cryptomap_1" is permitting only TCP which is OK as far as you want to permit only TCP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to permit only UDP, then the access-list entry for "outside_cryptomap_1" should be "access-list outside_cryptomap_1 permit udp object-group Sever_Access object-group Server_VPN object-group Oracle_forms"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to permit both TCP and UDP, then you need two access-list. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_cryptomap_1 permit tcp object-group Sever_Access object-group Server_VPN object-group Oracle_forms &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_cryptomap_1 permit udp object-group Sever_Access object-group Server_VPN object-group Oracle_forms &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The idea behind service object group with option tcp-udp in object-group command is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that we don't need to specify object-group command separately for tcp and udp. Its just to avoid duplication of effort. If we don't use tcp-udp we need to specify 2 service object groups one for tcp and one for udp. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service TCP-PORTS tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port-object range 9000 9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service UDP-PORTS udp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port-object range 9000 9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;** Please rate all helpful posts **&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ajagadee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-26T14:09:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Syntax for access list object group tcp-udp</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-for-access-list-object-group-tcp-udp/m-p/825739#M974343</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a number of object groups set-up on a PIX and I have a question regarding the access-list syntax&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service Oracle_forms tcp-udp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  description Oracle Forms Ports&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port-object range 9000 9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_cryptomap_1 permit tcp object-group Sever_Access object-group Server_VPN object-group Oracle_forms &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other object-groups are defined bu where the service group details a range of ports which may be TCP and or UDP should the access list reflect that is permit TCP correct given that the object-service group contains both UDP  TCP ports?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-for-access-list-object-group-tcp-udp/m-p/825739#M974343</guid>
      <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:17:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syntax for access list object group tcp-udp</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-for-access-list-object-group-tcp-udp/m-p/825740#M974348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even though you have both TCP and UDP Port Range defined in the Ojbject-Group called Oracle_forms, the Access-list "outside_cryptomap_1" is permitting only TCP which is OK as far as you want to permit only TCP. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to permit only UDP, then the access-list entry for "outside_cryptomap_1" should be "access-list outside_cryptomap_1 permit udp object-group Sever_Access object-group Server_VPN object-group Oracle_forms"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want to permit both TCP and UDP, then you need two access-list. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_cryptomap_1 permit tcp object-group Sever_Access object-group Server_VPN object-group Oracle_forms &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_cryptomap_1 permit udp object-group Sever_Access object-group Server_VPN object-group Oracle_forms &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The idea behind service object group with option tcp-udp in object-group command is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that we don't need to specify object-group command separately for tcp and udp. Its just to avoid duplication of effort. If we don't use tcp-udp we need to specify 2 service object groups one for tcp and one for udp. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service TCP-PORTS tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port-object range 9000 9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service UDP-PORTS udp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  port-object range 9000 9010&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;** Please rate all helpful posts **&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:09:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-for-access-list-object-group-tcp-udp/m-p/825740#M974348</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajagadee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-26T14:09:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syntax for access list object group tcp-udp</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-for-access-list-object-group-tcp-udp/m-p/825741#M974349</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks you confirmed my thoughts not having used this feature before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 05:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/syntax-for-access-list-object-group-tcp-udp/m-p/825741#M974349</guid>
      <dc:creator>Communications</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-27T05:25:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

