<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CPU and NAT in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404229#M974540</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to see what percentage of my CPU is taken up by NAT?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also is there any advantage to have my servers on private ip space and have then Natted?&amp;nbsp; I understand why you pat but why would you do a one to one nat on servers?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:54:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Wan_Whisperer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:54:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CPU and NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404229#M974540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to see what percentage of my CPU is taken up by NAT?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also is there any advantage to have my servers on private ip space and have then Natted?&amp;nbsp; I understand why you pat but why would you do a one to one nat on servers?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:54:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404229#M974540</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wan_Whisperer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:54:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU and NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404264#M974542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what device is this router/FW/Switch ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There are many use case to use Public IP with Natted IP&amp;nbsp; :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Main reasons&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Save public IP space&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Securing the host&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;Server behind a NAT cannot receive incoming connections unless incoming traffic is explicitly forwarded to the them by the router.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4. Outgoing traffic from NAT router's IP, this hides details of the machines behind the NAT from external systems, i.e. how many machines, their private IPs,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;5. With 1 Public IP you can manage many Private IP's.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BB&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 21:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404264#M974542</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-22T21:51:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU and NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404855#M974544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ON an ASA 5510.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I understand all of you answers but still don't understand why you would not a whole class C private to a whole Class C public&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404855#M974544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wan_Whisperer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-25T13:05:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU and NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404887#M974545</link>
      <description>Due to IPv4 exhaustion concerns.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404887#M974545</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florin Barhala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-25T13:49:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU and NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404889#M974546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I 100% understand NAT and how it works.&amp;nbsp; I am not talking about NAT overlaod.&amp;nbsp; I am talking one to one&amp;nbsp; ie...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;192.168.1.1 - 201.1.1.1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;192.168.1.2 - 201.1.1.2&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;192.168.1.3 - 201.1.1.3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;192.168.1.4 - 201.1.1.4&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;192.168.1.5 - 201.1.1.5&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and on and on for the whole class C.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3404889#M974546</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wan_Whisperer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-25T13:54:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU and NAT</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3406974#M974547</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Its all depends on what is your requirement, you need to look at the KPI by deploying...learn...consider ..change ..life cycle..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BB&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 05:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cpu-and-nat/m-p/3406974#M974547</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-28T05:44:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

