<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Firewall connectivty to redundant core switches in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3367315#M975110</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can soneone please share their design experience for physical connectivity between 2 redundant core switches to one firewall to 2 redundant aggregation industrial switches?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can we connect directly to firewall as shown in attached?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:38:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adeebtaqui</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:38:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Firewall connectivty to redundant core switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3367315#M975110</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can soneone please share their design experience for physical connectivity between 2 redundant core switches to one firewall to 2 redundant aggregation industrial switches?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can we connect directly to firewall as shown in attached?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:38:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3367315#M975110</guid>
      <dc:creator>adeebtaqui</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:38:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewall connectivty to redundant core switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3367324#M975111</link>
      <description>You can try creating a bridge group on the firewall then rely on STP to take care for one of the links.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3367324#M975111</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florin Barhala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T12:37:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewall connectivty to redundant core switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3367339#M975112</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are configuring HSRP on the industrial aggregation switches and core switches. Will this be enough for movement of traffic to firewall from the active switch?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3367339#M975112</guid>
      <dc:creator>adeebtaqui</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T13:00:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Firewall connectivty to redundant core switches</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3368051#M975113</link>
      <description>HSRP will do fine. Your main concern would be L2 traffic rather than packet routing between L3 devices.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firewall-connectivty-to-redundant-core-switches/m-p/3368051#M975113</guid>
      <dc:creator>Florin Barhala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-18T12:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

