<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Global NAT question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777985#M977711</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd think the global (DMZ3) 1 would be matched when packets entering any interface with a nat (interface) 1 command had to egress the DMZ3 interface to reach their destination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dhananjeyan Kaneshayogan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-04T14:59:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Global NAT question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777980#M977706</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With the below config, since there is no "nat" for DMZ3, what will that interface see as the source address for traffic getting to servers from the outside interface?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (outside) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (DMZ2) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (DMZ3) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (DMZ4) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (DMZ1) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (DMZ2) 1 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (DMZ4) 0 access-list nonat2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address outside 6.2.1.130 255.255.255.224&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address inside 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address DMZ1 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address DMZ2 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address DMZ3 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address DMZ4 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:34:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777980#M977706</guid>
      <dc:creator>wilson_1234_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:34:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global NAT question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777981#M977707</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wilson, I don't see a nat 0 for DMZ3? Nevermind, I misunderstood your question. There needs to be some translation for the traffic to go from DMZ3 to outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777981#M977707</guid>
      <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-25T17:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global NAT question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777982#M977708</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Wilson,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assuming that you have statics in place for servers on DMZ3 as --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (DMZ3,outside) X Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and outside host a.a.a.a is trying to access X, when packet reaches Y (given that ACL on outside interface is permitting access), Y will see the packet coming from a.a.a.a.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is because there is no "outside" nat configured which would nat packets coming from outside interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777982#M977708</guid>
      <dc:creator>vitripat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-25T19:16:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global NAT question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777983#M977709</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the input,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, is the "1" in:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (DMZ3) 1 interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;doing anything since there is no "nat" statement?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777983#M977709</guid>
      <dc:creator>wilson_1234_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-25T19:40:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global NAT question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777984#M977710</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;More than that, the whole statement isn't doing anything because of no nat, not just the 1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:23:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777984#M977710</guid>
      <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-25T20:23:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global NAT question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777985#M977711</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd think the global (DMZ3) 1 would be matched when packets entering any interface with a nat (interface) 1 command had to egress the DMZ3 interface to reach their destination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/global-nat-question/m-p/777985#M977711</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dhananjeyan Kaneshayogan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-04T14:59:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

