<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: No Route Warnings in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715341#M980792</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please post your config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:32:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>joshua.walton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T00:32:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>No Route Warnings</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715340#M980790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In our syslog we are getting a ton of the following messages:  No route to 63.168.xxx.xxx from 70.209.211.170.  Now 63.168.xxx.xxx is a static nat on our outside interface and the 70. address is some IP unaffiliated with us.  Unles I'm reading the message wrong, why would we be getting a message saying no route to 63.168.xxx.xxx when that is on my interface and is it the 70 address sending an ICMP message to us stating such?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:14:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715340#M980790</guid>
      <dc:creator>bfrericks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:14:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No Route Warnings</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715341#M980792</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please post your config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 00:32:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715341#M980792</guid>
      <dc:creator>joshua.walton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-15T00:32:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No Route Warnings</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715342#M980793</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any particular part? you're after?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 11:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715342#M980793</guid>
      <dc:creator>bfrericks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-15T11:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No Route Warnings</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715343#M980794</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you provide output from "show static" and "show route"? If using 7.x commands would be "sh run static" &amp;amp; "sh run route".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vibhor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:22:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715343#M980794</guid>
      <dc:creator>vitripat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-16T13:22:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No Route Warnings</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715344#M980795</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It was over 4000 characters so it made me add as an attacment but here are the results of the show commands.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715344#M980795</guid>
      <dc:creator>bfrericks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-16T13:46:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No Route Warnings</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715345#M980796</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I receive these "no route to" messages as well. Doesn't seem to effect anything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No route to 75.x.x.x from 208.x.x.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;208.x.x.x = my asa outside interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;75.x.x.x = a public ip of a remote access vpn client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could 70.209.211.170 also have been a vpn client in your case? I think if that were the case we would be onto something here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 19:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-route-warnings/m-p/715345#M980796</guid>
      <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-16T19:10:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

