<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN Problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814884#M980833</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kev &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you possibly post sanitised configs. Is there any chance that you are doing some NAT at the remote end that would make it miss the crypto access-list ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:41:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814883#M980832</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have set up a site to site vpn and i have a problem where return traffic is not hitting the access-list on the return journey.  The access list is confgiured with the correct range.  Has anyone come across this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kev&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:13:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814883#M980832</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevinhobson2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:13:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814884#M980833</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kev &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you possibly post sanitised configs. Is there any chance that you are doing some NAT at the remote end that would make it miss the crypto access-list ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814884#M980833</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814885#M980837</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe a little more information here. What device? What are you trying to accomplish? Is this an interface acl? Config?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814885#M980837</guid>
      <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:43:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN Problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814886#M980840</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its NAT on a one to one i was being blind thanks for the help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kev&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:49:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-problem/m-p/814886#M980840</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevinhobson2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:49:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

