<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VMS 2.3 on Solaris - Slow config generation - Java Issues?  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499853#M98810</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have that exact config actually.  One server running IDS MC and the other running Sec Mon.  Still it is a very slow beast.  I really see Java as the main killer here, at least the way it is coded. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It still works, it is just very slow which is not good during an event that requires fast actions.  In that case I move to the sensors directly and then I have to reimport the sensors after my changes are complete.  Not ideal but it gets the job done.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ntrngrusr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-02-06T16:17:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VMS 2.3 on Solaris - Slow config generation - Java Issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499851#M98805</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any idea why generating a simple configuration for a single sensor takes more than 1 full minute?  The whole process to make a sensor config change is slow at best yet the server is showing 1.2 GB free mem, procs are running very low, yet this process is slow.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe I am just getting frustrated but I really feel this needs to be a faster process.  I know about the generate and deploy button at the top but I am surprised at how slow this can be as well.  Is Java a root cause of this because in other apps I have had the issue with Java.  &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:52:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499851#M98805</guid>
      <dc:creator>ntrngrusr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:52:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMS 2.3 on Solaris - Slow config generation - Java Issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499852#M98807</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To avoid unnecessarily slow response times while using VMS, you install VMS security configuration management components (Firewall MC, Router MC, IPS MC, and AUS) on a separate server from VMS monitoring components (Performance Monitor and Security Monitor). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499852#M98807</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2006-02-02T17:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMS 2.3 on Solaris - Slow config generation - Java Issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499853#M98810</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have that exact config actually.  One server running IDS MC and the other running Sec Mon.  Still it is a very slow beast.  I really see Java as the main killer here, at least the way it is coded. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It still works, it is just very slow which is not good during an event that requires fast actions.  In that case I move to the sensors directly and then I have to reimport the sensors after my changes are complete.  Not ideal but it gets the job done.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499853#M98810</guid>
      <dc:creator>ntrngrusr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-06T16:17:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VMS 2.3 on Solaris - Slow config generation - Java Issues?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499854#M98813</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my experiences with various Java applications, Java performance on Sun SPARC is slow in comparison to Intel based platforms.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend you try deploying your VMS 2.3 installation of IPS MC on a Windows Intel platform and see for yourself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Added bonus, you might find this Java benchmark useful reading material.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.volano.com/report/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.volano.com/report/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 21:16:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vms-2-3-on-solaris-slow-config-generation-java-issues/m-p/499854#M98813</guid>
      <dc:creator>npham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-02-06T21:16:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

