<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SD-Access Multi-Site Deployment - ISE PSN Question in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-multi-site-deployment-ise-psn-question/m-p/4408918#M1338</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In an SD-Access multi-site deployment with 10G metro-ethernet between sites can a shared PSN pair be used across all sites (hosted at DC) or do we need to dedicate a PSN pair per fabric site? All documents seem to point to dedicated PSN per fabric site, like WLC), but if the site is relatively small and two or more sites can easily be accommodated by a suitably-sized PSN, then is this supported? associating same PSN to multiple sites?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 15:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>newtonr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-26T15:30:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SD-Access Multi-Site Deployment - ISE PSN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-multi-site-deployment-ise-psn-question/m-p/4408918#M1338</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In an SD-Access multi-site deployment with 10G metro-ethernet between sites can a shared PSN pair be used across all sites (hosted at DC) or do we need to dedicate a PSN pair per fabric site? All documents seem to point to dedicated PSN per fabric site, like WLC), but if the site is relatively small and two or more sites can easily be accommodated by a suitably-sized PSN, then is this supported? associating same PSN to multiple sites?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 15:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-multi-site-deployment-ise-psn-question/m-p/4408918#M1338</guid>
      <dc:creator>newtonr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-26T15:30:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access Multi-Site Deployment - ISE PSN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-multi-site-deployment-ise-psn-question/m-p/4408929#M1339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;newtonr,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Each site should have at least 2 PSNs for resilience, but the PSNs do not have to be local to the site and multiple sites can share PSNs. As long as your PSNs can handle all required operations from all sites, you could certainly have just a pair of PSNs (maybe one in each DC) that all sites can use. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You could also point to a load balancer VIP, behind which could sit multiple PSNs. The advantage to a VIP, in my opinion, is that it is easier to add / remove / change PSNs without needing to change the configuration on a site. For example, if you point to a VIP and need to add a third PSN, then all you need to do is add it to the load balancer policies instead of adding it to each site.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When we say that we need a PSN per site, what we are really saying is that we need a PSN configuration per site, but that the PSN can be remote.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p1"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;Cheers,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s2"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;Scott Hodgdon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p2"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s3"&gt;Senior Technical Marketing Engineer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p2"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s3"&gt;Enterprise Networking and Cloud Group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 15:57:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-multi-site-deployment-ise-psn-question/m-p/4408929#M1339</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Hodgdon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-26T15:57:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access Multi-Site Deployment - ISE PSN Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-multi-site-deployment-ise-psn-question/m-p/4409289#M1342</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for quick response Scott. That's what I thought was the case but just needed clarification.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 08:32:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-multi-site-deployment-ise-psn-question/m-p/4409289#M1342</guid>
      <dc:creator>newtonr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-27T08:32:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

