<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Intermediate node SD Access in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558695#M1771</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I will advise having Cat 9500 as an intermittent node (compare to Cat9300), again this is pure your decision.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;yes, four-tier is what you looking to deploy. that is valid.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:33:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-24T09:33:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intermediate node SD Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558619#M1767</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a question about the number of intermediate nodes in a SD Access fabric. Can i add two intermediate nodes behind each other? So you would get:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Location A Border Node --&amp;gt; Location B Intermediate Node --&amp;gt; location C Intermediate node --&amp;gt; Location D Fabric Edge Nodes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This because the fibers/switches of location D comes together at Location C and there are no fibers between location C and location A.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See attachment voor network overview.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kind regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pascal&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:51:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558619#M1767</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pascal Lacroix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T07:51:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate node SD Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558638#M1768</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Technically i do not see any issue on this design. ( how you claim in DNAC about node important)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check if this is feasible, Intermediate node or distribution ( is this single switch, what model ?)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Look at four-tier :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/CVD/Campus/cisco-sda-design-guide.html#EdgeNode" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/CVD/Campus/cisco-sda-design-guide.html#EdgeNode&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 08:23:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558638#M1768</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T08:23:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate node SD Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558678#M1770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Balaji,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your answer. We are going to use a Cat9500-16X or Cat9300X-24Y as an intermediate node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i look at the four-tier model, then i should be able to connect two intermediate nodes (distribution 1 and distribution 2) behind each other. Correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pascal&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:10:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558678#M1770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pascal Lacroix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T09:10:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate node SD Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558695#M1771</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I will advise having Cat 9500 as an intermittent node (compare to Cat9300), again this is pure your decision.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;yes, four-tier is what you looking to deploy. that is valid.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:33:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558695#M1771</guid>
      <dc:creator>balaji.bandi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T09:33:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate node SD Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558696#M1772</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ok, i will take that in consideration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thx!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 09:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558696#M1772</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pascal Lacroix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T09:35:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate node SD Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558941#M1774</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Pascal,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There are no restrictions on the type or number of Intermediate nodes in your SDA fabric nor are they any restrictions on connectivity.&amp;nbsp; The only function of an Intermediate node is to be able to &lt;EM&gt;route&lt;/EM&gt; packets between other fabric nodes, so as long as it is capable of routing and meets your connectivity and speed requirements, any topology/model is supported.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;FWIW - Technically, there is no actual Intermediate node role in SDA, and DNAC will not show a specific feature for you to enable.&amp;nbsp; It is literally just a device that facilitates connectivity in your topology.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Roddie&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:11:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558941#M1774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roddie Hasan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T15:11:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate node SD Access</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558948#M1775</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Roddie,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your answer. That's clear to me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Pascal&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 15:20:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-sd-access/m-p/4558948#M1775</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pascal Lacroix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T15:20:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

