<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SD-Access External RP &amp;amp; MC-source in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4855012#M2399</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks Jerom&lt;BR /&gt;no need to Lab as we on the same page&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 04:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-15T04:56:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SD-Access External RP &amp; MC-source</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4851931#M2382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i'm trying to figure out configuration use-case for the Subject. I've read&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/networking-knowledge-base/cisco-sd-access-multicast/ta-p/4068110" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Cisco SD-Access Multicast - Cisco Community&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;but it seems to use RP on the BN instead of expected RP on the FHR.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Would we still have (*,G) entry on the FE like this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;(*, 227.7.7.7), 1d01h/stopped, RP &lt;STRONG&gt;9.253.253.2&lt;/STRONG&gt;, flags: SJC &amp;lt;-- address of external RP on FHR&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Incoming interface: &lt;FONT color="#993300"&gt;LISP0.4099&lt;/FONT&gt;, RPF nbr 9.254.254.66, LISP: [&lt;FONT color="#993300"&gt;9.254.254.66, 232.0.3.170&lt;/FONT&gt;]&lt;BR /&gt;...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;2. on the br-2?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;br-2#sh ip mroute vrf corp 227.7.7.7 verbose&lt;BR /&gt;(*, 227.7.7.7), 00:41:40/00:03:20, RP &lt;STRONG&gt;9.253.253.2&lt;/STRONG&gt;, flags: Sp&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Incoming interface: Vlan3049, RPF nbr &lt;STRONG&gt;9.253.253.2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;3. We wouldnt have any RP configured within Fabric, right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 13:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4851931#M2382</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-09T13:27:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access External RP &amp; MC-source</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4854307#M2389</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are these outputs from your lab or from the document? I cannot find the first output.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;*,G can be created by either an IGMP membership report (LHR) or along the S,G in the FHR&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; BR2 in this case seems to know the RP upstream vlan 3049, where RPF resolves, this is an output of RP outside of the fabric&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 06:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4854307#M2389</guid>
      <dc:creator>jalejand</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-14T06:58:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access External RP &amp; MC-source</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4854334#M2394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the output i gave is modified output from referred document assuming that RP is on the FHR instead of BN. Basically now i'm pretty sure that answers would be 'yes' for all 3 questions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 07:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4854334#M2394</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-14T07:31:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access External RP &amp; MC-source</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4854944#M2398</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Andy, my lab is offline at the moment so giving a theoretical answer without validating. #3 is definitely correct, there is no RP within the SD-Access Fabric when you nominate RP outside the fabric from the Multicast Configuration Workflow. #1 and #2, this looks correct to me and makes sense to me. Ideally I'd prefer to validate on the CLI of a real switch but cannot right now. Lab should be back online next week if you need CLI validation. Cheers, Jerome&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 22:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4854944#M2398</guid>
      <dc:creator>jedolphi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-14T22:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access External RP &amp; MC-source</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4855012#M2399</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks Jerom&lt;BR /&gt;no need to Lab as we on the same page&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 04:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-external-rp-amp-mc-source/m-p/4855012#M2399</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-15T04:56:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

