<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Intermediate Node Roles in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5008763#M2969</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;i'd say fully feasible. u also can colocate CPs with BNs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/Website/enterprise/sda_compatibility_matrix/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;Cisco Software-Defined Access Compatibility Matrix&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:51:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-01-30T06:51:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intermediate Node Roles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5007735#M2960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I would like to check if I can put an intermediate node as a Control Plan node and being part of the underlay? thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5007735#M2960</guid>
      <dc:creator>fatalXerror</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-29T07:40:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate Node Roles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5007749#M2961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If your Fabric Site will stay within configurable CP limits after adding new CP u just go to Provision / Fabric Sites / Site select intermediate switch &amp;amp; assign it CP role.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5007749#M2961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-29T07:56:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate Node Roles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5008554#M2968</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/293790"&gt;@Andrii Oliinyk&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, basically, the original plan for the intermediate node is just to distribute my EN for the underlay but since because of budget, I am planning to set the intermediate node as CP as well as underlay but not sure if it is feasible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 03:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5008554#M2968</guid>
      <dc:creator>fatalXerror</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-30T03:37:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intermediate Node Roles</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5008763#M2969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i'd say fully feasible. u also can colocate CPs with BNs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/Website/enterprise/sda_compatibility_matrix/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;Cisco Software-Defined Access Compatibility Matrix&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 06:51:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/intermediate-node-roles/m-p/5008763#M2969</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-30T06:51:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

