<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Onboard switch to DNAC in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268946#M3957</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/293790"&gt;@Andrii Oliinyk&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/113909"&gt;@jedolphi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Its cisco 9200 model switch&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 09:44:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sreejithsreenivas64</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-08T09:44:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268763#M3953</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;2 switches with 48 and 24 ports placed in stack.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a new requirement the 24 port poe switch replaced with 48 port switch. But after giving stack connectivity and provisioning new 48 port switch, we are able to access only first 24 ports of new switch and from other ports&amp;nbsp; unable to get ip.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268763#M3953</guid>
      <dc:creator>sreejithsreenivas64</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-07T15:52:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268776#M3954</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;how does stack look in inventory (matched S/Ns, models are recognized properly)?&lt;BR /&gt;did you reprovision stack with new member?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 16:32:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268776#M3954</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-07T16:32:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268805#M3955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Hi,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;As you asked, inventory is getting the correct sn and provision had been done properly.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 18:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268805#M3955</guid>
      <dc:creator>sreejithsreenivas64</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-07T18:59:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268821#M3956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what is your CatC SW &amp;amp; did u check its R/Ns against similar behaviour?&lt;BR /&gt;would appreciate&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/113909"&gt;@jedolphi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to take a look at this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 20:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268821#M3956</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-07T20:37:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268946#M3957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/293790"&gt;@Andrii Oliinyk&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/113909"&gt;@jedolphi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Its cisco 9200 model switch&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 09:44:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268946#M3957</guid>
      <dc:creator>sreejithsreenivas64</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-08T09:44:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268949#M3958</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i asked for your CatC SW version &amp;amp; whether u read Release Notes to it.&lt;BR /&gt;CatC doesnt interact with switch hardware blocks (e.g. ports) directly. instead it creates objects in its DB &amp;amp; do visualization &amp;amp; configuration tasks using that objects. Thus from my pov u hit bug in CatC representing itself like failure to update port-objects in DB with replacement 24p member with 48p member. Call the TAC &amp;amp; ask them to involve BU bc only staff involved by BU is allowed to tweak DB.&lt;BR /&gt;my condolences.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5268949#M3958</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-08T10:51:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5270039#M3963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi. Sounds like a TAC case is necessary.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5270039#M3963</guid>
      <dc:creator>jedolphi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-11T17:00:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5270418#M3964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/113909"&gt;@jedolphi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/293790"&gt;@Andrii Oliinyk&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Issue ws resolved as we reprovisioned the switch.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5270418#M3964</guid>
      <dc:creator>sreejithsreenivas64</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-12T15:15:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Onboard switch to DNAC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5270442#M3965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i asked u earlier did u reprovision the switch :0)&lt;BR /&gt;but good to know u resolved it&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/onboard-switch-to-dnac/m-p/5270442#M3965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrii Oliinyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-12T15:51:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

