<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SD-Access and IP-ACL in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990517#M402</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Create a static IP to SGT mapping for the destination and&amp;nbsp; define the policy on the&amp;nbsp; ISE to block ICMP&amp;nbsp; from the source SGT to DGT&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 02:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sandjose</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-28T02:12:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SD-Access and IP-ACL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990340#M401</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have an IP-ACL on an SVI Interface today. How can I implement it into a SD-Access Fabric?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not meaning a micro segmentation. Just for example deny any icmp traffic for a specific device.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No Firewall in front of the site. Do DACL does the job for me and are they supported?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Markus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:14:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990340#M401</guid>
      <dc:creator>markus.forrer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-27T20:14:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access and IP-ACL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990517#M402</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Create a static IP to SGT mapping for the destination and&amp;nbsp; define the policy on the&amp;nbsp; ISE to block ICMP&amp;nbsp; from the source SGT to DGT&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 02:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990517#M402</guid>
      <dc:creator>sandjose</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-28T02:12:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access and IP-ACL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990577#M405</link>
      <description>But where will this policy be applied? As I know with GBACL they will be enforced on the outgoing interface inside the fabric.&lt;BR /&gt;But my destination is outside the fabric.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 06:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990577#M405</guid>
      <dc:creator>markus.forrer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-28T06:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access and IP-ACL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990590#M406</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it will be enforced on the vlan&amp;nbsp; as we push the following config as part of fabric&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;cts role-based enforcement&lt;BR /&gt;cts role-based enforcement vlan-list &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 06:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3990590#M406</guid>
      <dc:creator>sandjose</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-28T06:56:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD-Access and IP-ACL</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3991781#M409</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The best place to deploy is on Border or Fusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/policy-enforcement-within-sda-border/ta-p/3646816" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-documents/policy-enforcement-within-sda-border/ta-p/3646816&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2019 20:44:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sd-access-and-ip-acl/m-p/3991781#M409</guid>
      <dc:creator>Heriberto Diaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-01T20:44:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

