<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SDA L2 Hand-off on border node in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-l2-hand-off-on-border-node/m-p/4035224#M523</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont see a problem with this , as long as this is a dedicated interface which will be needed to be setup as a trunk for L2 handoff&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Im not aware of any HW limitiations at this point.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:45:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ldanny</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-25T08:45:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SDA L2 Hand-off on border node</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-l2-hand-off-on-border-node/m-p/4030734#M501</link>
      <description>&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi All,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it possible to configure a L2 hand-off on a border node that is already configured with both IP-Transit and SD-Access Transit?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Also, are there any restrictions using L2 hand-off on a Cat9600?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir="ltr"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Many thanks in advance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:44:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-l2-hand-off-on-border-node/m-p/4030734#M501</guid>
      <dc:creator>krandrew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-17T08:44:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDA L2 Hand-off on border node</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-l2-hand-off-on-border-node/m-p/4035224#M523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont see a problem with this , as long as this is a dedicated interface which will be needed to be setup as a trunk for L2 handoff&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Im not aware of any HW limitiations at this point.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:45:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-l2-hand-off-on-border-node/m-p/4035224#M523</guid>
      <dc:creator>ldanny</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-25T08:45:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDA L2 Hand-off on border node</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-l2-hand-off-on-border-node/m-p/4116739#M724</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No Restriction, but the recommendation is to use a separate device for L2 Border handoff to safeguard the entire Network meltdown due to Spanning tree issues.. Hope this helps..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:15:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-l2-hand-off-on-border-node/m-p/4116739#M724</guid>
      <dc:creator>mnagired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-10T17:15:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

