<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SDA with Extended Node / Windows Clients DHCP Decline in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-with-extended-node-windows-clients-dhcp-decline/m-p/4142913#M801</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Markus,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IPDT must be enabled for a client to register with the Control Plane and for the Control Plane to be informed that a client has unplugged from a switchport. Any changes to the IP Device Tracking configuration put in place by DNA Center should be done with TAC supervision when an SD-Access fabric is in place.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p1"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;Cheers,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s2"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;Scott Hodgdon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p2"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s2"&gt;Senior Technical Marketing Engineer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p2"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s2"&gt;Enterprise Networking and Cloud Group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Hodgdon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-08-28T10:17:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SDA with Extended Node / Windows Clients DHCP Decline</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-with-extended-node-windows-clients-dhcp-decline/m-p/4142896#M800</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SD-Access Fabric running with some Extended Nodes (C3560CX).&lt;BR /&gt;Clients (Windows) complain about Duplicate IP Adresse. The weird thing is, that the reported MAC address is the MAC address from the Exteneded Nodes - Uplink Interface to the Edge Node...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As we're in migration we have L2 handoff configured with L2 flooding.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just looking around for a quick workaround: Are the any impacts for the clients/fabric if I disable IPDT on the Extended Nodes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem looks like:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ios-nx-os-software/8021x/116529-problemsolution-product-00.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ios-nx-os-software/8021x/116529-problemsolution-product-00.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any Ideas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:15:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-with-extended-node-windows-clients-dhcp-decline/m-p/4142896#M800</guid>
      <dc:creator>markus.forrer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-28T09:15:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDA with Extended Node / Windows Clients DHCP Decline</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-with-extended-node-windows-clients-dhcp-decline/m-p/4142913#M801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Markus,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IPDT must be enabled for a client to register with the Control Plane and for the Control Plane to be informed that a client has unplugged from a switchport. Any changes to the IP Device Tracking configuration put in place by DNA Center should be done with TAC supervision when an SD-Access fabric is in place.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p1"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;Cheers,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s2"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s1"&gt;Scott Hodgdon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p2"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s2"&gt;Senior Technical Marketing Engineer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="p2"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="s2"&gt;Enterprise Networking and Cloud Group&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-with-extended-node-windows-clients-dhcp-decline/m-p/4142913#M801</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Hodgdon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-28T10:17:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDA with Extended Node / Windows Clients DHCP Decline</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-with-extended-node-windows-clients-dhcp-decline/m-p/4142940#M802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After a closer look, it looks like that not all Extended Nodes are configured the same way...&lt;BR /&gt;The Extended Nodes with IPDT activated on the uplink port has no port-channel configuration....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Extended Nodes with IPDT disabled or inacitve on the uplink port has the normal port-channel configuration.....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the problem is sourced by not proberly provisioned Extended Nodes...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/sda-with-extended-node-windows-clients-dhcp-decline/m-p/4142940#M802</guid>
      <dc:creator>markus.forrer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-28T11:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

