<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cisco 9500 as DNS Server problem in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/cisco-9500-as-dns-server-problem/m-p/4148254#M851</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, route leak is in place as same IP is serving DHCP and DHCP is working fine. I think problem is related to switch not forwarding dns queries coming to it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:32:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OrkhanRustamli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-09T08:32:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cisco 9500 as DNS Server problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/cisco-9500-as-dns-server-problem/m-p/4147194#M841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my fabric network cisco 9500series stack is acting as Fusion. I have configured DNS Server on it to server as proxy to my clients. Last 3 days we have been doing migration to office and I had to change 9500 and reconfigure from 0 again and upgraded image to&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;cat9k_iosxe.16.12.04.SPA.bin.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is now DNS is not working on clients, they have to use 8.8.8.8 directly. I tried pinging some global domains from switch itself, which works fine but users` request are not processed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is not any firewall between as I imported switch loopback into VRFs and back.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is configuration i tried first:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;ip domain name XYZ.local
ip domain-lookup
ip name-server 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
ip dns server

ip host dnac.XYZ.local 192.168.xxx.yyy&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I tried to do DNS Forwarding with new way:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;ip access-list standard DNS_PERMIT
 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255

ip dns name-list 1 permit .*

ip dns view default
 domain name-server 8.8.8.8
 domain name-server 8.8.4.4
 domain name XYZ.local
 dns forwarding source-interface Loopback0

ip dns view-list LAN
 view default 1
  restrict source access-group DNS_PERMIT
  restrict name-group 1

ip dns server view-group LAN
ip dns server&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;None of above helped. Users can even query the local binding which defined in switch with "ip host". Clients can ping switch`s loopback address which is used as dns server. And again from switch I can ping all the domains.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What can be the reason?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 08:19:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/cisco-9500-as-dns-server-problem/m-p/4147194#M841</guid>
      <dc:creator>OrkhanRustamli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-07T08:19:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9500 as DNS Server problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/cisco-9500-as-dns-server-problem/m-p/4147931#M850</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since users are part of VRF, are you injecting a default route into VRF table?&amp;nbsp; All the above configs are part of GRT, which is fine, but hope the route leaking on the fusion is taken care off?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/cisco-9500-as-dns-server-problem/m-p/4147931#M850</guid>
      <dc:creator>mnagired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-08T16:00:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cisco 9500 as DNS Server problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/cisco-9500-as-dns-server-problem/m-p/4148254#M851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, route leak is in place as same IP is serving DHCP and DHCP is working fine. I think problem is related to switch not forwarding dns queries coming to it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:32:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/cisco-9500-as-dns-server-problem/m-p/4148254#M851</guid>
      <dc:creator>OrkhanRustamli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-09T08:32:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

