<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DNAC //ISE Communication in Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/dnac-ise-communication/m-p/4160599#M878</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to use DNAC management port, instead of Enterprise port to communicate to Cisco ISE?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 08:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hasitha siriwardhana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-02T08:55:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DNAC //ISE Communication</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/dnac-ise-communication/m-p/4160599#M878</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to use DNAC management port, instead of Enterprise port to communicate to Cisco ISE?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 08:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/software-defined-access-sd-access/dnac-ise-communication/m-p/4160599#M878</guid>
      <dc:creator>hasitha siriwardhana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-02T08:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

