<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Stealthwatch Enterprise - Flow matching issues in Security Analytics</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-enterprise-flow-matching-issues/m-p/4006433#M392</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's likely not a problem with the fields in the flow record but with the sources of data being exported.&amp;nbsp; Flow matching works best when all the exporters are sending the same fields.&amp;nbsp; You presented a flow record but not all exporters (including firewalls) offer configurable flow records.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You said you have one router and two firewalls exporting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You did mention the models of firewalls.&amp;nbsp; That said not all firewalls send flow data the same.&amp;nbsp; Cisco's ASA exports NSEL, which while in a NetFlow format sends flow data based on the firewalls function and configuration.&amp;nbsp; For example, NSEL uses a fixed export format that will include username if authentication is configured on the firewall.&amp;nbsp; It will also include data about any IP address translations if NAT is configured. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other firewalls have their own export characteristics.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A couple of suggestions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Try disabling flow export from the Core Firewall. It may be redundant with what the core router is exporting.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Try enabling export from an aggregation router.&amp;nbsp; Another idea might be to enable flow from either a remote access concentrator (firewall?) or wireless LAN controller (or router that connects either of those devices to the core) that bring remote access users into the network.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2020 17:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brford</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-04T17:18:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stealthwatch Enterprise - Flow matching issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-enterprise-flow-matching-issues/m-p/3943097#M353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've got Stealthwatch Enterprise up and running and so far I have to say I'm really liking it but we are having some issues with flow matching which results in a lot of traffic being picked up as being a new flow instead of being part of normal client -&amp;gt; server patterns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've 3 exporters at present all sending Netflow v9 format (Core router, Core firewall &amp;amp; Perimeter firewall) averaging about 1.5k fps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone recommendations on optimising this or encountered similar issues? Our flow record setup is as below&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;flow record StealthwatchFCNFRec&lt;BR /&gt;match ipv4 tos&lt;BR /&gt;match ipv4 protocol&lt;BR /&gt;match ipv4 source address&lt;BR /&gt;match ipv4 destination address&lt;BR /&gt;match transport source-port&lt;BR /&gt;match transport destination-port&lt;BR /&gt;match interface input&lt;BR /&gt;collect interface output&lt;BR /&gt;collect counter bytes long&lt;BR /&gt;collect counter packets long&lt;BR /&gt;collect timestamp sys-uptime first&lt;BR /&gt;collect timestamp sys-uptime last&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Guys!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 07:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-enterprise-flow-matching-issues/m-p/3943097#M353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eoin.Quinn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-18T07:44:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stealthwatch Enterprise - Flow matching issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-enterprise-flow-matching-issues/m-p/4006433#M392</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's likely not a problem with the fields in the flow record but with the sources of data being exported.&amp;nbsp; Flow matching works best when all the exporters are sending the same fields.&amp;nbsp; You presented a flow record but not all exporters (including firewalls) offer configurable flow records.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You said you have one router and two firewalls exporting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You did mention the models of firewalls.&amp;nbsp; That said not all firewalls send flow data the same.&amp;nbsp; Cisco's ASA exports NSEL, which while in a NetFlow format sends flow data based on the firewalls function and configuration.&amp;nbsp; For example, NSEL uses a fixed export format that will include username if authentication is configured on the firewall.&amp;nbsp; It will also include data about any IP address translations if NAT is configured. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other firewalls have their own export characteristics.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A couple of suggestions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Try disabling flow export from the Core Firewall. It may be redundant with what the core router is exporting.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Try enabling export from an aggregation router.&amp;nbsp; Another idea might be to enable flow from either a remote access concentrator (firewall?) or wireless LAN controller (or router that connects either of those devices to the core) that bring remote access users into the network.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2020 17:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-enterprise-flow-matching-issues/m-p/4006433#M392</guid>
      <dc:creator>brford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-04T17:18:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

