<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Stealthwatch VM sizing Query in Security Analytics</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-vm-sizing-query/m-p/4261547#M611</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Shabeeb,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the same FC VM can be used as long as the resources are increased to support the volume.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2020 20:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>joebucha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-20T20:31:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stealthwatch VM sizing Query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-vm-sizing-query/m-p/4261509#M610</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of our customer has purchased VM editions of SMC, FC and FS appliances and 25000 flows licenses. We found that we have different models of VM appliances like SMCVE, SMC2000VE and FCVE,FCVE2000. I found that these specs are based on the host count,exporters,flows etc. Now the question is that now we have less than 25000 flows and we deployed FCVE appliance for example and later we had a requirement to have more than 40000 flows license, then can we put the license in the same FCVE (we will increase disk,RAM and CPU) or we have to deploy an instance of FCVE2000 from scratch and put the license there?. Kindly advise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shabeeb&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:36:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-vm-sizing-query/m-p/4261509#M610</guid>
      <dc:creator>SHABEEB KUNHIPOCKER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-20T17:36:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stealthwatch VM sizing Query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-vm-sizing-query/m-p/4261547#M611</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Shabeeb,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the same FC VM can be used as long as the resources are increased to support the volume.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2020 20:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-analytics/stealthwatch-vm-sizing-query/m-p/4261547#M611</guid>
      <dc:creator>joebucha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-20T20:31:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

