<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic VoIP Wi-Fi Instruments and SIP? in Unified Communications Infrastructure</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/voip-wi-fi-instruments-and-sip/m-p/3459163#M150511</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When is Cisco going to allow their voip wi-fi instruments (7921/25) to start using SIP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:39:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>craig.pollitt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-28T01:39:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VoIP Wi-Fi Instruments and SIP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/voip-wi-fi-instruments-and-sip/m-p/3459163#M150511</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When is Cisco going to allow their voip wi-fi instruments (7921/25) to start using SIP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:39:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/voip-wi-fi-instruments-and-sip/m-p/3459163#M150511</guid>
      <dc:creator>craig.pollitt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-28T01:39:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VoIP Wi-Fi Instruments and SIP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/voip-wi-fi-instruments-and-sip/m-p/3459164#M150512</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its currently not on our short list.&amp;nbsp; We might have another type of station thats supports WIFI but nothing solid on it yet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:30:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/voip-wi-fi-instruments-and-sip/m-p/3459164#M150512</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmaudlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-29T01:30:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VoIP Wi-Fi Instruments and SIP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/voip-wi-fi-instruments-and-sip/m-p/3459165#M150513</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would also add to James' posting that it should not really make a difference which protocol is being used on the backend to Communications Manager.&amp;nbsp; This "protocol war" was waged some time ago to really disrupt the market.&amp;nbsp; We validated with our CUCM 5.x release that SIP or SCCP, it does not make a difference when we offered both.&amp;nbsp; The number of customers running a pure SIP signalling backend is far and few between as it is not really that important.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is important is integration to other systems, vendors, etc and that we can do via SIP.&amp;nbsp; The endpts, they will all run SIP at some point so we can continue to remain Open and follow those standards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:34:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/voip-wi-fi-instruments-and-sip/m-p/3459165#M150513</guid>
      <dc:creator>sameyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-06T18:34:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

