<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Expressway E without UDP traffic in Unified Communications Infrastructure</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403539#M166991</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What do you mean by that the IP is different? Could you take and post screenshots of the specifics?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 16:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Roger Kallberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-15T16:06:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Expressway E without UDP traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403518#M166986</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the change of the link of internet, there no traffic UDP in Expressway E.&lt;BR /&gt;In the Jabber status, is possible to see the packets send, but none is received.&lt;BR /&gt;When capture of logs in the Espressway E, is possible to see there no UDP traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;In the firewall, all the UDP ports are open and the IPv4 static NAT address is already changed to the new IP of the new link.&lt;BR /&gt;Does someone have some idea about why the Expressway E has no UDP traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 14:17:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403518#M166986</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cinco F Smartnet-Tac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-15T14:17:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Expressway E without UDP traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403520#M166987</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you updated the public DNS A record with the new IP address?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 14:32:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403520#M166987</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger Kallberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-15T14:32:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Expressway E without UDP traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403525#M166989</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If jabber can register via MRA, I think the DNS is ok, but when I Check, the IP of the expressway is different from the IP in the IPV4 Nat Address, how is possible for the jabber to register via MRA?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 15:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403525#M166989</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cinco F Smartnet-Tac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-15T15:09:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Expressway E without UDP traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403528#M166990</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;IP address of Expressway will be your DMZ IP address. on the expressway E&amp;gt; ip configuration &amp;nbsp;Page if you enabled nat, you have to update the Public IP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Refer below guide and make sure &amp;nbsp;that your opened &amp;nbsp;ports as mentioned in the document for MRA. (Refer the doc &amp;nbsp;corresponding to your expressway version)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X12-5/Cisco-Expressway-IP-Port-Usage-for-Firewall-Traversal-Deployment-Guide-X12-5.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X12-5/Cisco-Expressway-IP-Port-Usage-for-Firewall-Traversal-Deployment-Guide-X12-5.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 15:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403528#M166990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nithin Eluvathingal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-15T15:29:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Expressway E without UDP traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403539#M166991</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What do you mean by that the IP is different? Could you take and post screenshots of the specifics?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 16:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/expressway-e-without-udp-traffic/m-p/4403539#M166991</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger Kallberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-15T16:06:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

