topic federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com in Unified Communications Infrastructure https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772371#M60684 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>We have not. Extremely frustrating. We are getting the exact error as you are with the <NOT-AUTHORIZED> deal on server dialback. We are using a CA issued certificate.</NOT-AUTHORIZED></P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:29:53 GMT Ethan Haberman 2012-07-10T15:29:53Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772366#M60679 <P>We are a cisco partner.&nbsp; I would like to federate our presence domain to cisco.com so we can collaborate across jabber.&nbsp; I've got it working to google talk.&nbsp; Are there special requirements to make this work with cisco.com?</P> Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:45 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772366#M60679 joshw 2019-03-19T10:56:45Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772367#M60680 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi</P><P></P><P>Most likely no. I'll keep it to any others saying otherwise.</P><P></P><P>CUPS XMPP federation Guide with WebEx Connect</P><P><A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cups/8_6/english/integration_notes/Federation/Planning_chapter.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cups/8_6/english/integration_notes/Federation/Planning_chapter.html</A></P><P></P><P>Thanks</P></BODY></HTML> Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:14:59 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772367#M60680 Md Hasan 2011-11-14T23:14:59Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772368#M60681 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Have you had any luck with this? We are attempting the same federation.</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:09:46 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772368#M60681 Ethan Haberman 2012-02-14T17:09:46Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772369#M60682 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>No.&nbsp; I've worked with several folks from Cisco on this but you yet had any luck.&nbsp; Can anyone please chime in and offer some assistance?</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:40:00 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772369#M60682 joshw 2012-02-14T17:40:00Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772370#M60683 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Did you ever have any luck with getting your CUP federation up to cisco.com?</P></BODY></HTML> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:01:09 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772370#M60683 joshw 2012-06-28T20:01:09Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772371#M60684 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>We have not. Extremely frustrating. We are getting the exact error as you are with the <NOT-AUTHORIZED> deal on server dialback. We are using a CA issued certificate.</NOT-AUTHORIZED></P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:29:53 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772371#M60684 Ethan Haberman 2012-07-10T15:29:53Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772372#M60685 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Hi </P><P></P><P>Still we are trying to federate with cisco.com but no luck yet. Everything is looks fine. both domain (</P><P>my domain and cisco domain) <SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">is resolved from outside through XMPP port </SPAN><SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">5269 </SPAN><SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;">. I can talk to gtalk but not cisco.com.</SPAN></P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:48:02 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772372#M60685 Muaaz El Kamali 2013-07-16T09:48:02Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772373#M60686 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>I'm not positive that WebEx Messenger (which Cisco.com uses, not on-prem) supports DNS dialback. If memory serves you need to set TLS Optional and *uncheck* "Require client-side security certificates" on CUPS. I spent a few minutes hunting but cannot find documentation to backup the lack of dialback support; treat this as a hunch.</P><P></P><P>Also, your CA-signed certificate:</P><UL><LI>Does the server's domain match the presence domain specified under System Topology &gt; Settings?</LI><LI>Is the server's FQDN resolvable from external DNS to the NATed IP(s)?</LI><LI>Is the certificate installed in the xmpp-server store (and the signing CA(s) in the xmpp-server-trust store) or only Tomcat?</LI></UL><P></P><P></P><P>Please remember to <A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.cisco.com/docs/DOC-6212">rate helpful responses</A> and identify <A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.cisco.com/community/help#discussions_questions">helpful</A> or <A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.cisco.com/community/help#discussions_correct">correct</A> answers.</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 16 Jul 2013 13:45:13 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772373#M60686 Jonathan Schulenberg 2013-07-16T13:45:13Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772374#M60687 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>The problem we had was that our domain i.e."company.com" was registered as a web-ex connect domain.&nbsp; In other words, it was being hosted by cisco webex.&nbsp; In order to correct the problem, I had to open a trouble ticket with webex connect and they had to do something to flush our domain from their system.&nbsp; They told me that it would require a change-control on their end and implied that it was "major".&nbsp; Once they made their correction, we were able to federate our on-prem CUP server to cisco.com.&nbsp; </P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:31:34 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772374#M60687 joshw 2013-07-16T14:31:34Z federate CUPS 8.5 with cisco.com https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772375#M60688 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><P>Ah! They had to de-provision your domain from WebEx Messenger/Connect. Nice catch.</P></BODY></HTML> Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:04:48 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/federate-cups-8-5-with-cisco-com/m-p/1772375#M60688 Jonathan Schulenberg 2013-07-16T15:04:48Z