<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: License Usage Question in Unified Communications Infrastructure</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/license-usage-question/m-p/3381956#M6629</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it would.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's important to note that a lower-level license request (like for Basic) will consume a higher-level license to stay in compliance. You are purchasing CUWL licenses which are, I believe, more expensive than Basic Licenses. It might be worthwhile to see if you can purchase less-expensive licenses like more Basic or Enhanced licenses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, make sure that you have ownership of devices configured wherever possible. Take, for example, a user that has a phone and also an SNR profile. The SNR profile must be "owned" and will consume a Basic License. If the phone's owner is listed as "Anonymous" it will also consume (I believe) a Basic License. But if you assign the SNR users as the owner of the phone as well both devices will consume a single Enhanced Plus license.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which means that if ownership is assigned throughout your system you may be able to reduce your overall existing license consumption.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 16:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maren Mahoney</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-11T16:39:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>License Usage Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/license-usage-question/m-p/3381934#M6628</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a quick question, we are currently over the limit for our Basic license requirements and now I'm getting the error message when I log into CUCM. So I logged into the PLM server and it says required for basic is 314 and installed is 246 and available is -36. My manager order 40 CUWL standard to take care of the issue but what I wanted to know is would that leave me with only 4 license once I install it to take care of the -36, I've attached a screen shot as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:20:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/license-usage-question/m-p/3381934#M6628</guid>
      <dc:creator>scooter817</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-19T20:20:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License Usage Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/license-usage-question/m-p/3381956#M6629</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it would.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's important to note that a lower-level license request (like for Basic) will consume a higher-level license to stay in compliance. You are purchasing CUWL licenses which are, I believe, more expensive than Basic Licenses. It might be worthwhile to see if you can purchase less-expensive licenses like more Basic or Enhanced licenses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, make sure that you have ownership of devices configured wherever possible. Take, for example, a user that has a phone and also an SNR profile. The SNR profile must be "owned" and will consume a Basic License. If the phone's owner is listed as "Anonymous" it will also consume (I believe) a Basic License. But if you assign the SNR users as the owner of the phone as well both devices will consume a single Enhanced Plus license.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which means that if ownership is assigned throughout your system you may be able to reduce your overall existing license consumption.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 16:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/license-usage-question/m-p/3381956#M6629</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maren Mahoney</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-11T16:39:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: License Usage Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/license-usage-question/m-p/3381957#M6630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Maren that's what I thought, I'm going to tell my manager we need to order like another 40 to have a buffer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 16:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications-infrastructure/license-usage-question/m-p/3381957#M6630</guid>
      <dc:creator>scooter817</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-11T16:31:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

