<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Suggestions for high density client areas in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063445#M100467</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We deal with this a lot.  Radio placement is key.  You can use "bags of water"  - people to help with signal containment. If you build zones for 2.4 and keep your radios low, you can accommodate a lot more people in a given area. You can also backfill with some 802.11a only radios as well to a certain degree.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use a combination of 1252s and 1242s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 1252s are nice for sheer performance and the 1242s are nice for directional signal. We have seen the 1242s handle large loads as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ericgarnel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-14T15:13:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suggestions for high density client areas</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063442#M100464</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've had a request to provide classroom wireless access - on the order of 150 laptops in a room taking online exams.      We have boxes of 1230s and a nice 4402 WLC but that all seems a bit inadequate to handle this request.  There is a single 1230 in this particular room (of 4 in the building) and I'm going to add two more to the room with some wall mount flat antennas but I don't think that's going to get 'er all done.  And there's another class room that will likley get the 1/2 or better of the same load and it's only about 60' away.  It'll be all about G radios because I'm sure none of these students (or a very small percentage) have N equipment.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:46:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063442#M100464</guid>
      <dc:creator>ckelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:46:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for high density client areas</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063443#M100465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use 1240AGs, dual radios.  I have lots of training rooms and found that 3 dual band radio APs in the coverage area were adequate.  It all depends on the nature of the traffic, ie. bandwidth per trainee used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:25:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063443#M100465</guid>
      <dc:creator>tkhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-13T20:25:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for high density client areas</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063444#M100466</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That got me to thinking - maybe N is not a bad idea.  The 1250 is a step up from the 1240 and the increased channel size might be of more benefit.  And since this particular division is pretty much demanding a solution, the solution may require that the users also step up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063444#M100466</guid>
      <dc:creator>ckelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-13T23:00:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestions for high density client areas</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063445#M100467</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We deal with this a lot.  Radio placement is key.  You can use "bags of water"  - people to help with signal containment. If you build zones for 2.4 and keep your radios low, you can accommodate a lot more people in a given area. You can also backfill with some 802.11a only radios as well to a certain degree.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use a combination of 1252s and 1242s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 1252s are nice for sheer performance and the 1242s are nice for directional signal. We have seen the 1242s handle large loads as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/suggestions-for-high-density-client-areas/m-p/1063445#M100467</guid>
      <dc:creator>ericgarnel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-14T15:13:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

