<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Antenna Diversity Question in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45377#M102173</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you refering to antennas on an indoor access point or to antennas that are outside, say &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on a roof?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 22:50:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jaunger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-11-09T22:50:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Antenna Diversity Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45376#M102172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are there specific distances that antennas should be placed to maximize the benefit of antenna diversity in an 802.11b compliant WLAN?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 05:52:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45376#M102172</guid>
      <dc:creator>jclay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T05:52:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Antenna Diversity Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45377#M102173</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you refering to antennas on an indoor access point or to antennas that are outside, say &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;on a roof?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 22:50:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45377#M102173</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaunger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-09T22:50:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Antenna Diversity Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45378#M102174</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Usually recommended is 10-20 wavelengths.  A wavelength is a couple of inches at 2.4GHZ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 02:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45378#M102174</guid>
      <dc:creator>ED CARMODY</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-13T02:07:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Antenna Diversity Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45379#M102175</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the type of fading that 802.11b is trying to combat, the signals from two antennas separated by even a wavelength are largely uncorrelated.  Hence, even very small separations work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The spacing is non-critical.  Since the receiver is only using one antenna at a given time, you don't have to worry about the phase relationship between the two antennas.  If you were using two antennas at once (typical in two-way radio and broadcast TV/FM, etc.), the spacing and length of feedlines is critical because there the phase matters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:54:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/antenna-diversity-question/m-p/45379#M102175</guid>
      <dc:creator>csthomas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-14T22:54:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

