<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: quick 'N' question in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015929#M102440</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks jerome,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so if we are upgrading the lan in future as the wlan administrator i should tell our boys to get that type of switch !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Megz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>meggerman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-23T10:42:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>quick 'N' question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015925#M102436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i have 400 1242AG cisco access points, they can run 2.4 and/or 5ghz. im guessing due to the dual radio nature of MIMO on N that the 1242ags will not in any way support the completed 'n' draft spec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:03:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015925#M102436</guid>
      <dc:creator>meggerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:03:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: quick 'N' question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015926#M102437</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct, due to the dual (or triple) radio nature of 802.11n, 1242 will not be 802.11n...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jerome&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:17:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015926#M102437</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeromehenry_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-23T09:17:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: quick 'N' question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015927#M102438</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;bugger ! lol&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks again jerome. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspected as such as two complete separate supplies are needed in the chain.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would moving to 'n' require gigabit switches ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:49:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015927#M102438</guid>
      <dc:creator>meggerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-23T09:49:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: quick 'N' question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015928#M102439</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Haha! 1242 is a nice AP though huhu...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And yes, moving to 802.11n would imply making sure that the infrastructure behind could follow (or "benefit"), which means Gig switches... if you can afford the E series (3560E, 3750E) are also powerful enough to PoE a 1252 (802.11n, with its multiple radios, means that a normal switch is not powerful enough to PoE a 802.11n AP)...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015928#M102439</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeromehenry_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-23T10:22:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: quick 'N' question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015929#M102440</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks jerome,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so if we are upgrading the lan in future as the wlan administrator i should tell our boys to get that type of switch !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Megz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/quick-n-question/m-p/1015929#M102440</guid>
      <dc:creator>meggerman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-23T10:42:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

