<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Workgroup Bridge Roaming in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/workgroup-bridge-roaming/m-p/61482#M103155</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not having a WGB here, I can only guess, but I would say you should watch the impact of re-establishing all of those sessions - even if the WGB is happy, your applications may not be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2002 18:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>blue.modal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-05-07T18:04:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Workgroup Bridge Roaming</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/workgroup-bridge-roaming/m-p/61481#M103154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible for a workgroup bridge to roam from one AP to another with 8 devices behind the bridge?  Is there a performance degradation when this is done (i.e. does it take a long time for the devices to re-associate to the new AP)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 06:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/workgroup-bridge-roaming/m-p/61481#M103154</guid>
      <dc:creator>hedwards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T06:08:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Workgroup Bridge Roaming</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/workgroup-bridge-roaming/m-p/61482#M103155</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not having a WGB here, I can only guess, but I would say you should watch the impact of re-establishing all of those sessions - even if the WGB is happy, your applications may not be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2002 18:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/workgroup-bridge-roaming/m-p/61482#M103155</guid>
      <dc:creator>blue.modal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-07T18:04:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

