<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MAB equivalent for the wireless clients in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855870#M108563</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, That can be done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have to configure the SSID with WPA2+PSK and MAC filtering , In the AAA server you have to map the radius server which you want to use for MAB.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 12:08:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sathiyanarayanan Ravindran</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-14T12:08:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MAB equivalent for the wireless clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3854781#M108556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MAB&amp;nbsp; ==&amp;gt; For Wired Client only ==&amp;gt; If dot1x authentication fails, then Mac authentication is tried.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-9/config-guide/b_cg89/wlan_security.html" target="_self"&gt;MAC Authentication Failover to 802.1X&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; ==&amp;gt; If mac authentication fails, then try dot1x authentication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Is there not any MAB equivalent in wireless, wherein if dot1x authentication fails for wireless clients than MAB is tried?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. If we enable mac authentication on a WLAN, will it consume any end point license from ISE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MAC authentication.PNG" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/36569i9A76E05CDE94CBE1/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="MAC authentication.PNG" alt="MAC authentication.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 17:23:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3854781#M108556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Muhammed Adnan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T17:23:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB equivalent for the wireless clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3854998#M108557</link>
      <description>1. I don't think that is possible on wireless. &lt;BR /&gt;2. No idea.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 12:45:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3854998#M108557</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-13T12:45:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB equivalent for the wireless clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855678#M108558</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Patoberli for the response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is MAC authentication with Radius for WPA2-PSK SSID even supported?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 08:02:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855678#M108558</guid>
      <dc:creator>Muhammed Adnan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T08:02:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB equivalent for the wireless clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855695#M108559</link>
      <description>Not that I know of, not without supplying a correct PSK.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can use iPSK to have a custom PSK per MAC address, but that needs creating a policy per client(group).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 08:35:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855695#M108559</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T08:35:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB equivalent for the wireless clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855731#M108560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;MAB and dot1.x can't be configure on the same SSID.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please check the doc for&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A title="IPSK Deployment Cisco WLC and ISE" href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-5/b_Identity_PSK_Feature_Deployment_Guide.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;IPSK Deployment Cisco WLC and ISE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 09:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855731#M108560</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sathiyanarayanan Ravindran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T09:26:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB equivalent for the wireless clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855815#M108561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ravindran,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response and the link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not looking for dot1x and MAB on the same SSID.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The combination that I am looking out for is wpa2-psk + mac authentication via Radius.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 11:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855815#M108561</guid>
      <dc:creator>Muhammed Adnan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T11:09:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB equivalent for the wireless clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855862#M108562</link>
      <description>It's either PSK or 802.1x. Now with iPSK you have the possibility to have a different PSK per Mac address, this wasn't possible before.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What you could do, you can block / permit the specific mac addresses directly on the WLC, but that is usually a very bad idea (Mac addresses don't offer any security and can be cloned by everybody!!!).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 11:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855862#M108562</guid>
      <dc:creator>patoberli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T11:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MAB equivalent for the wireless clients</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855870#M108563</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, That can be done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have to configure the SSID with WPA2+PSK and MAC filtering , In the AAA server you have to map the radius server which you want to use for MAB.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 12:08:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/mab-equivalent-for-the-wireless-clients/m-p/3855870#M108563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sathiyanarayanan Ravindran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-14T12:08:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

