<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Foreign WLC and Anchor WLC in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3404053#M111883</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;ok. On the foreign WLC, can I say the guest users on Layer 3 web auth to redirect the web page to an external server and give the anchor WLC as external server?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>abinaya.2.r</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-22T15:20:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Foreign WLC and Anchor WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3402622#M111878</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a foreign WLC at&amp;nbsp;America which is of model AIR-CT2504-K9 and the AIR-CAP3602I-A-K9 and AIR-CAP3502I-A-K9 APs registered to it. I also have an anchor WLC at Australia in DMZ zone which is of model AIR-CT5508-K9&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will establish an EOIP tunnel between these two WLCs. The Guest users will take a Layer2 PSK authentication on the Foreign WLC and a Layer 3 Web authentication at&amp;nbsp;the Anchor WLC. The Anchor WLC has an internal DHCP configured. My question is&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. When I have an user connected at America, As the traffic will go through the EOIP tunnel, Will I have latency issues as these two WLCs are located in different regions?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Do I have an option for the user traffic to take a Layer2 PSK authentication on the foreign WLC&amp;nbsp;and then Layer 3 Web authentication at anchor WLC and once the user will get an&amp;nbsp;IP address from the anchor WLC, can the traffic be routed&amp;nbsp;back to &amp;nbsp;the local gateway&amp;nbsp; Internet at America itself? Is that a good solution?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 15:45:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3402622#M111878</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinaya.2.r</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T15:45:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Foreign WLC and Anchor WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3402630#M111879</link>
      <description>That is a bad design. Layer 2 auth is always done on the foreign and any layer 3 is done on the anchor along with dhcp.  Why not have the web portal on the 2504 and then you can place the “guest” traffic locally. You can even look at FlexConnect local switching as a design and auth users but drop their traffic local at the site. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:15:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3402630#M111879</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-20T13:15:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Foreign WLC and Anchor WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3402838#M111880</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;But, I would like to segregate the Guest traffic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3402838#M111880</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinaya.2.r</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-20T17:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Foreign WLC and Anchor WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3403276#M111881</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The issue here is I am trying to solve&amp;nbsp; how we can keep the single WLC (Anchor) to manage the password for Guest users and use the local site gateway to access the internet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is it a feasible solution?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:59:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3403276#M111881</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinaya.2.r</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-21T11:59:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Foreign WLC and Anchor WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3403359#M111882</link>
      <description>There is no possible way to do that. You would need something like ISE to host the portal page and user accounts. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3403359#M111882</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-21T14:04:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Foreign WLC and Anchor WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3404053#M111883</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ok. On the foreign WLC, can I say the guest users on Layer 3 web auth to redirect the web page to an external server and give the anchor WLC as external server?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/foreign-wlc-and-anchor-wlc/m-p/3404053#M111883</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinaya.2.r</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-22T15:20:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

