<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thanks Philip. in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881947#M11940</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Philip.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So if they use different channels, there will be no interference between the APs?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 04:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bab L</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-07T04:41:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless Access Point placement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881945#M11938</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we physically place two APs next to each other, would that create any issues? If yes what is the minimum distance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The AP's are for different companies and they don't communicate with each other. They are ther to connect users from two different companies.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your feedback.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 12:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881945#M11938</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bab L</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T12:11:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>They should be on different</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881946#M11939</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;They should be on different channels to limit interference. &amp;nbsp;If it was me, I'd probably put them 300mm apart, just to provide some RF isolation from RF bleed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 04:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881946#M11939</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-07T04:33:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Philip.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881947#M11940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Philip.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So if they use different channels, there will be no interference between the APs?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 04:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881947#M11940</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bab L</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-07T04:41:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Correct.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881948#M11941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 04:43:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881948#M11941</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-07T04:43:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>if it's in 2,4 Ghz, use</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881949#M11942</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if it's in 2,4 Ghz, use channel 1,6 or 12 (it's the standard) . you must let 4 channel between your channel and their channel or you will got interference.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881949#M11942</guid>
      <dc:creator>DumortierC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-11T15:28:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Channels 1,6,11 standard</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881950#M11943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Channels 1,6,11 standard states 25 MHz between channels.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;IEEE Std 802.11 (2012), which states "In a multiple cell network topology, overlapping and/or adjacent cells using different channels can operate simultaneously without interference if the distance between the center frequencies is at least 25&amp;nbsp;MHz&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Mobility/emob41dg/emob41dg-wrapper/ch3_WLAN.pdf&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV class="page" title="Page 7"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="section"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="layoutArea"&gt;
&lt;DIV class="column"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;14 channels are defined in the IEEE 802.11b direct sequence (DS) channel set. Each DS channel transmitted is 22 MHz wide, but the channel separation is only 5 MHz. This leads to channel overlap such that signals from neighboring channels can interfere with each other. In a 14-channel DS system (11 usable channels in the US), only three nonoverlapping (and thus, non-interfering) channels 25 MHz apart are possible (channels 1, 6, and 11). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-access-point-placement/m-p/2881950#M11943</guid>
      <dc:creator>George Stefanick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-11T20:35:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

