<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: WLC  in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026967#M123638</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The wireless users connect to the ap and the ap sends their traffic through the LWAPP-tunnel to the WLC. So Switch2 doesn't even have to have vlan 20 or 30, because the user traffic enters the wired LAN through the WLC-connection to switch1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore i think, if you would put a machine on switch2 into vlan 20 or 30, the wlan-users would not be able to reach this machine, because their traffic would enter switch1  through the WLC but it would not pass the trunk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SJessulat_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-25T13:11:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026964#M123635</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have doubt with regard to WLC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scnerio is like this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WLC is connected to switch1 with port gi0/1 switch1 is connected to &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;switch2 on gi0/2,and i have AP on switch2 .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem is this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2 vlan on controller 20,30 for user and 10 as management vlan for WLC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The trunk link coming from switch 1 to switch2 have vlan 10 allowed &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and also for switch2 to access point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have Vlan 20 and 30 configured on both the switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All the user are getting connected without any problem to vlan 20 and 30 ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that information of vlan 20 and 30 will be carried by Vlan 10 ,but how will the &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;switch know about that.since i am not letting vlan 20 and 30 to pass on the trunk which i not allowed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope i am clear enough&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 22:46:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026964#M123635</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishwancc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T22:46:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026965#M123636</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope i understood your problem: you don't see, why the users can connect to vlan 20 and 30 although you blocked that vlans between the two switches?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is your concern, maybe this helps you: A WLC establishes a LWAPP-tunnel to each AP. Every AP sends its traffic through this tunnel. So the user traffic sorta origins on the WLC-ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But i have a question: Can the wireless users on VLAN 20 or 30 reach clients on switch 2 VLAN 20 or 30? They should not be able to, since the traffic is not allowed to pass the trunk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026965#M123636</guid>
      <dc:creator>SJessulat_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-24T10:31:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026966#M123637</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello SJessulat ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand what you are saying put i need little more explanitation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answe your question the wireless user are only on switch Switch2 not on Switch1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i understand correctly,switch2 will send traffic for guest using vlan 10 ,but i am not sure how the encapsulation takes palce on the switch for the VLAN.i am attaching network diagram hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:52:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026966#M123637</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishwancc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-25T05:52:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026967#M123638</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The wireless users connect to the ap and the ap sends their traffic through the LWAPP-tunnel to the WLC. So Switch2 doesn't even have to have vlan 20 or 30, because the user traffic enters the wired LAN through the WLC-connection to switch1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore i think, if you would put a machine on switch2 into vlan 20 or 30, the wlan-users would not be able to reach this machine, because their traffic would enter switch1  through the WLC but it would not pass the trunk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:11:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026967#M123638</guid>
      <dc:creator>SJessulat_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-25T13:11:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: WLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026968#M123639</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;CLEAR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 05:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wlc/m-p/1026968#M123639</guid>
      <dc:creator>vishwancc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-26T05:40:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

