<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Access Point Placement in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836831#M127166</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco does recommend a max of 20', but I have seen AP's mounted higher than that with no issues.&amp;nbsp; Varying mounting heights really don't affect devices as long as you have the coverage.&amp;nbsp; In a warehouse, you might have a pick line with ap's mounted high and then you have office areas or mezzanine areas with ap's mounted low.&amp;nbsp; A good site survey can provide you with ap placements and mounting heights with good overall coverage for data, voice, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-08T15:36:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Access Point Placement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836830#M127165</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco recommended antenna mounting height (indoor) is between 10 and 15 feet (max 20). Could you please share your thoughts on these:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- you mount&amp;nbsp; APs (let's say 30 APs) in the warehouse:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; a) in the scenario A all APs are mounted on the same height - 12 feet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; b) in the scenario B the APs height varies - 10 of ARs on 10 feet, 10 of APs on 15 feet and 10 of APs on 20 feet (the APs' location is the same)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How will the above APs placement affect the coverage, RSSI, location services or VoIP? Does it matter if we place all APs on the same height?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 04:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836830#M127165</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcinwojcik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T04:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access Point Placement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836831#M127166</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco does recommend a max of 20', but I have seen AP's mounted higher than that with no issues.&amp;nbsp; Varying mounting heights really don't affect devices as long as you have the coverage.&amp;nbsp; In a warehouse, you might have a pick line with ap's mounted high and then you have office areas or mezzanine areas with ap's mounted low.&amp;nbsp; A good site survey can provide you with ap placements and mounting heights with good overall coverage for data, voice, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836831#M127166</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-08T15:36:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access Point Placement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836832#M127167</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Warehouse deployment is tricky at it's best.&amp;nbsp; One of the reasons is the amount of metal inside and outside a warehouse.&amp;nbsp; It gets trickier if metal shelves are dynamic. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As Scott has recommended, you can't go wrong with a proper site survey.&amp;nbsp; This way, no one will blame you. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836832#M127167</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-08T22:30:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access Point Placement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836833#M127168</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Guys.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/access-point-placement/m-p/1836833#M127168</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcinwojcik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-09T08:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

