<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bridging with two access points in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-with-two-access-points/m-p/620634#M128121</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No. If they're in the same pool (block) of addresses,and in teh same VLAN, then they're on the same network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since it is acting (at its highest level) as a bridge, the AP doesn't care about IP addresses or subnets. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you put 'em in separate VLANs, on separate SSIDs, then it's like running on two separate systems. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue is, where are you terminating the VLANs? If they're on the same routers at each end the routers will not route to the same network block ... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'd need do do some interesting NATing to get it to work. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pretty kludgey all the way around.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-08T05:28:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bridging with two access points</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-with-two-access-points/m-p/620633#M128120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, is it possible too bridge two networks on same address pool with a 1100 b access point and a 350 access point &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 20:12:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-with-two-access-points/m-p/620633#M128120</guid>
      <dc:creator>handley88</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T20:12:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bridging with two access points</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-with-two-access-points/m-p/620634#M128121</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No. If they're in the same pool (block) of addresses,and in teh same VLAN, then they're on the same network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since it is acting (at its highest level) as a bridge, the AP doesn't care about IP addresses or subnets. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you put 'em in separate VLANs, on separate SSIDs, then it's like running on two separate systems. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The issue is, where are you terminating the VLANs? If they're on the same routers at each end the routers will not route to the same network block ... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'd need do do some interesting NATing to get it to work. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pretty kludgey all the way around.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-with-two-access-points/m-p/620634#M128121</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-08T05:28:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bridging with two access points</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-with-two-access-points/m-p/620635#M128122</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;so, if i use a different block of addresses like 192.168.0.X and 10.x.x.x on each ap and between the link each with a different SSID on each,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would that do the trick or would i need two seperate routers &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/bridging-with-two-access-points/m-p/620635#M128122</guid>
      <dc:creator>handley88</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-08T23:41:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

