Wireless bridge vs. access point with amplifier

wang-yang — Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:51:30 GMT

I am going to set up a wLAN where there are 4 data collecting instruments (A, B, C, D shown in the plot) in a mountain. Two neighbor nodes are 10km line-of-sight distance away from each other as shown in the attached plot. Point D communicates with server (point E), which is 60km away.

/ \ 60KM

A D----------E

\ /

My plan is to set up three Cisco wireless APs in the A, B, C points, two Cisco 1310 wireless bridges at D, E points, and one amplifier at D or E to reach 60km transmission distance. But I haven’t found any AP with range around 10km. Shall I use Cisco 1310 wireless bridge at A,B and C or use AP with amplifer? I know somebody has achieved more than 10km range by only access point and amplifier with other brand equipments. Can I add amplifiers at any Cisco APs to get over 10km range if I choose the lowest data rate?

I also have another question about Cisco antenna. I only found information about antenna ranges at 11Mbps data rate and 54Mbps. Is there any information of antenna range at 1Mbps?

Thanks for reading my questions.

Re: Wireless bridge vs. access point with amplifier

vmoopeung — Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:28:01 GMT

try out this

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5861/products_data_sheet09186a008022b11b.html

Re: Wireless bridge vs. access point with amplifier

wang-yang — Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:15:40 GMT

Thanks!

topic Re: Wireless bridge vs. access point with amplifier in Wireless

Wireless bridge vs. access point with amplifier

Re: Wireless bridge vs. access point with amplifier

Re: Wireless bridge vs. access point with amplifier