<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Spanning-Tree Portfast Trunk for APs in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/spanning-tree-portfast-trunk-for-aps/m-p/3314372#M129672</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have 8 mobility express enabled AP's that are running on my network. They are of course configured&amp;nbsp;on trunk ports (Management, SSID 1, SSID 2 etc.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently&amp;nbsp;we seeing some general client connectivity issues (short disconnects)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a feeling that this issue,&amp;nbsp;is due to a lot of interference and&amp;nbsp;noise in the environment -&amp;nbsp;and that this pollution is causing my clients to roam a lot between the eight APs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Something tells me that I should configure the switch uplink ports with switchport portfast trunk in order for clients to onboard quickly. Can anyone confirm this theory?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 15:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>allanhedegaard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T15:07:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spanning-Tree Portfast Trunk for APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/spanning-tree-portfast-trunk-for-aps/m-p/3314372#M129672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have 8 mobility express enabled AP's that are running on my network. They are of course configured&amp;nbsp;on trunk ports (Management, SSID 1, SSID 2 etc.)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently&amp;nbsp;we seeing some general client connectivity issues (short disconnects)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a feeling that this issue,&amp;nbsp;is due to a lot of interference and&amp;nbsp;noise in the environment -&amp;nbsp;and that this pollution is causing my clients to roam a lot between the eight APs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Something tells me that I should configure the switch uplink ports with switchport portfast trunk in order for clients to onboard quickly. Can anyone confirm this theory?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 15:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/spanning-tree-portfast-trunk-for-aps/m-p/3314372#M129672</guid>
      <dc:creator>allanhedegaard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T15:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spanning-Tree Portfast Trunk for APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/spanning-tree-portfast-trunk-for-aps/m-p/3314376#M129673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I dont think it will resolve your issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;as far my knowledge...&amp;nbsp;If you want to make a trunk port become Forwarding imediately after coming up, you need the spanning-tree porfast trunk command.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rather you should do the proper site survey and check the cause of noise and interference.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dont forget to rate helpful posts&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/spanning-tree-portfast-trunk-for-aps/m-p/3314376#M129673</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sandeep Choudhary</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-19T10:42:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spanning-Tree Portfast Trunk for APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/spanning-tree-portfast-trunk-for-aps/m-p/3314379#M129674</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Switchport fast would help only for the AP registration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For client roaming issues you need to focous on the AP cell coverage, AP/WLC configuration and the coverage requirments of the client equipments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would suggest these articles:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wireless LAN Fundamentals: Mobility – &lt;A href="http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=102282&amp;amp;seqNum=2" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=102282&amp;amp;seqNum=2&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mysteries of Wi-Fi roaming revealed, by 7signal:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://go.7signal.com/download-wifi-roaming-whitepaper" target="_blank"&gt;http://go.7signal.com/download-wifi-roaming-whitepaper&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope it helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:46:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/spanning-tree-portfast-trunk-for-aps/m-p/3314379#M129674</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vasco Costa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-19T10:46:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

