<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Too much overhead on an access point? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/too-much-overhead-on-an-access-point/m-p/267410#M13433</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an installation with approx 18 access points in a fairly small warehouse.  The Cisco 1200 AP&amp;#146;s are running firmware version 12.01 T1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have 3 VLAN&amp;#146;s at this facility and the cisco switches are doing trunking while the  AP&amp;#146;s are doing 802.1Q tagging, essentially a hybrid trunk.  We have approx 95 clients.  These consist of Spectralink phones and voice activated talkman terminals on one VLAN doing 128 bit WEP.  PC&amp;#146;s and laptops on another VLAN doing LEAP/PEAP aunthentication.  and legacy telxon equipment on its own separate VLAN without security.  Spectralink recommends that only 5 phones should connect per AP.  My question is, are we overloading the AP&amp;#146;s with all this overhead?  The issue we are having is that the phones cutout and do not function correctly. You can hold a conversation but it is of poor quality.    We have gone over the config with Spectralink and have run out of options.  The other clients appear fine.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 16:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tcggg0</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T16:16:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Too much overhead on an access point?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/too-much-overhead-on-an-access-point/m-p/267410#M13433</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an installation with approx 18 access points in a fairly small warehouse.  The Cisco 1200 AP&amp;#146;s are running firmware version 12.01 T1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have 3 VLAN&amp;#146;s at this facility and the cisco switches are doing trunking while the  AP&amp;#146;s are doing 802.1Q tagging, essentially a hybrid trunk.  We have approx 95 clients.  These consist of Spectralink phones and voice activated talkman terminals on one VLAN doing 128 bit WEP.  PC&amp;#146;s and laptops on another VLAN doing LEAP/PEAP aunthentication.  and legacy telxon equipment on its own separate VLAN without security.  Spectralink recommends that only 5 phones should connect per AP.  My question is, are we overloading the AP&amp;#146;s with all this overhead?  The issue we are having is that the phones cutout and do not function correctly. You can hold a conversation but it is of poor quality.    We have gone over the config with Spectralink and have run out of options.  The other clients appear fine.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 16:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/too-much-overhead-on-an-access-point/m-p/267410#M13433</guid>
      <dc:creator>tcggg0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T16:16:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Too much overhead on an access point?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/too-much-overhead-on-an-access-point/m-p/267411#M13434</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you explored any of the QoS mechanisms on the access point for the voice vlan?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/too-much-overhead-on-an-access-point/m-p/267411#M13434</guid>
      <dc:creator>rmiles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-09T16:54:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Too much overhead on an access point?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/too-much-overhead-on-an-access-point/m-p/267412#M13435</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes we have but this is related to Symbol phones it seems, not Spectralink.  I did see a note out there about Cisco Cetralized Key Management (CCKM) that can be used for Spectralink phones but I would have to put IOS on the AP.  Has anyone tried CCKM?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/too-much-overhead-on-an-access-point/m-p/267412#M13435</guid>
      <dc:creator>tcggg0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-01-13T21:09:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

