<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple AP Managers Question in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943400#M135266</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AP manager communicates with the AP's using CAPWAP.  The use for multiple AP managers to me doesn't make sense to do especially since its a 2504.  I have always just used the management interface for AP management and assign a primary and backup port.  You can do it the way you have stated, but what is the benefit. I have seen 5508's deployed using only one gigabit port and over 250 AP's and they had no problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott Fella&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from my iPhone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:39:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-21T10:39:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple AP Managers Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943399#M135265</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got a question concerning the configuration of multiple AP manager interfaces on -for example- a cisco WLC 2504. I've read the configuration guide but I'm not sure whether this is the way the protocol works. Say I want to distribute AP's (and traffic) across various AP Manager interfaces on the WLC. I would configure the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create one management interface (which will automatically also be an AP-Manager interface)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Configure 1 (or more) Seperate ap-manager interfaces, assign them to a port number, and select "Enable dynamic AP Management". VLAN ID's will be the same.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create a WLAN and configure it's interface to "management"&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it correct if I state that the LWAPP protocol takes care of the discovery from the Access Point and sends information about the available AP-manager interfaces back to the AP and the AP knows which ap-manager interfaces are available, connecting to the least loaded one?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 04:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943399#M135265</guid>
      <dc:creator>dominique.hermans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T04:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple AP Managers Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943400#M135266</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AP manager communicates with the AP's using CAPWAP.  The use for multiple AP managers to me doesn't make sense to do especially since its a 2504.  I have always just used the management interface for AP management and assign a primary and backup port.  You can do it the way you have stated, but what is the benefit. I have seen 5508's deployed using only one gigabit port and over 250 AP's and they had no problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott Fella&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sent from my iPhone&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:39:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943400#M135266</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-21T10:39:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple AP Managers Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943401#M135267</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your quick reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While the 2504 doesn't support usage of a LAG, using multiple AP-managers I would be able to connect the controller to 2 seperate switches for high availability in a scenario where I would tunnel all trafic back to the controller. Also, AP's would be divided between the AP-manager interfaces. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume you refer to the usage of H-REAP when talking about connecting 250 AP's over just 1 gb port?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:01:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943401#M135267</guid>
      <dc:creator>dominique.hermans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-21T11:01:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple AP Managers Question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943402#M135268</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No... I'm talking local ap's.&amp;nbsp; If you want to span the ap managers to different switches, that is fine, but you can make the primary port go to switch one and the backup to switch two.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/multiple-ap-managers-question/m-p/1943402#M135268</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-21T11:04:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

