<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic BR350 as LongRange AP? in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203464#M138286</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to connect a PCI352 client to BR350 acting as an AP 10kilometers away?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:49:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mymobile</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:49:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BR350 as LongRange AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203464#M138286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to connect a PCI352 client to BR350 acting as an AP 10kilometers away?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:49:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203464#M138286</guid>
      <dc:creator>mymobile</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T15:49:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 as LongRange AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203465#M138287</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Technically possible but not recommended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only real way to do long distance links is a pair of bridges&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 03:55:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203465#M138287</guid>
      <dc:creator>derwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-07-01T03:55:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 as LongRange AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203466#M138288</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmmm why is it not recommended? Even if you'll have 128bit WEP keys and mac address filtering?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203466#M138288</guid>
      <dc:creator>mymobile</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-07-01T11:24:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 as LongRange AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203467#M138289</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is not recommended because the standards specify a time window for receive before transmitting to avoid collisons, this time window is fixed in the standards. Just like standard Ethernet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As radio waves travel close to the speed of light it takes a finite time for  a radio wave to travel a set distance.  The time window in the standards works out to be  about 1 mile at the speed of light. You can get these radios to transmit further than 1 mile via the use of high gain antenna etc but the standards limit the "real" range to 1 mile.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A client can end up with lots of late collisions affecting throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no standard for the bridge function and as such you can tune this time window via the bridge spacing command in a BR350 but not and AP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco Clients can handle this change in receive window when talking to a Cisco device but you are still using the device outside of its optimum design.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:02:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203467#M138289</guid>
      <dc:creator>derwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-07-02T00:02:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 as LongRange AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203468#M138290</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to bridge the BR350 and a PCI352 card?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Im looking for a solution to bridge my outdoor clients without buying so many BR350's...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 02:39:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203468#M138290</guid>
      <dc:creator>mymobile</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-07-02T02:39:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 as LongRange AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203469#M138291</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would it be possible to have a BR350 on the HQ and a PCI352 Client 10km away? What kind of setup would be these? Does the PCI352 Client adapter supports BR350's bridging mode?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2003 11:32:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203469#M138291</guid>
      <dc:creator>mymobile</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-07-02T11:32:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BR350 as LongRange AP?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203470#M138292</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes a client card will associate to an BR350 when in root bridge mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will on other modes too here is the docco that expalins what each role in radio network means&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/350brdgs/brscg/br350ch3.htm#1016921" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wireless/airo_350/350brdgs/brscg/br350ch3.htm#1016921&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As said before it is technically possible to have this work, it is not the way I would design my network but you can get it to work&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As to if it will work on your site you will need to do the normal site survey as every environment is a little different&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2003 02:33:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/br350-as-longrange-ap/m-p/203470#M138292</guid>
      <dc:creator>derwin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-07-04T02:33:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

