<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Thank you for the answer!!! in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/fast-secure-roaming-protocols/m-p/3025121#M138428</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the answer!!!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have any experience with "hybrid SSIDs" - configuring FT and non-FT 802.1X key management at the same time? It is supported scenario but I cannot find any real world feedback.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MUQ_1899_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-27T18:34:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fast secure roaming protocols?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/fast-secure-roaming-protocols/m-p/3025119#M138426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, which is the most used protocol for "secure fast roaming"? Or which protocol do the most devices support in 2017?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have any statistics what percent of the new devices event support some kind of secure fast roaming?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/fast-secure-roaming-protocols/m-p/3025119#M138426</guid>
      <dc:creator>MUQ_1899_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:44:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Due to adaptation from</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/fast-secure-roaming-protocols/m-p/3025120#M138427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Due to adaptation from manufacturers, the best way to proceed is to look at the oldest to newest. We have played around with k/v/r and to be honest, there are still some devices that are out there that don't support them. &amp;nbsp;I know from my experience implementing wireless as a consultant, manufacturing and distribution centers have the oldest devices I have seen and sometimes even hospitals. So take a look at your environment and if you control the devices, that is a plus. I think K/V are okay to deploy but R is what can get tricky to deploy as it may cause issues with devices that don't support R. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I also believe that if you have a solid RF, that means enough density and optimized well, you don't need these features. &amp;nbsp;However, if you can implement them and have no issues with bugs or device support, why not.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:26:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/fast-secure-roaming-protocols/m-p/3025120#M138427</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-26T16:26:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thank you for the answer!!!</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/fast-secure-roaming-protocols/m-p/3025121#M138428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the answer!!!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Do you have any experience with "hybrid SSIDs" - configuring FT and non-FT 802.1X key management at the same time? It is supported scenario but I cannot find any real world feedback.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/fast-secure-roaming-protocols/m-p/3025121#M138428</guid>
      <dc:creator>MUQ_1899_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-27T18:34:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

