<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WCS proposal in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-proposal/m-p/1928570#M144139</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Never tried this feature before because I always get a new floor/site "done" using a wireless site survey.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T23:03:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WCS proposal</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-proposal/m-p/1928569#M144138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using the WCS to generate a proposal for wireless coverage. I have edited the maps to make sure the walls show up and then I did the 'generate proposal'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My building has 2 floors. The proposal for both floors came out with AP's basically stacked on top of each other. In other words, both floors looked pretty much identical for AP placement. Now, I've read that you should not stack AP's so I am confused about this proposal. Can anyone comment on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks-- &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 05:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-proposal/m-p/1928569#M144138</guid>
      <dc:creator>misscat123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T05:01:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WCS proposal</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-proposal/m-p/1928570#M144139</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Never tried this feature before because I always get a new floor/site "done" using a wireless site survey.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:03:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-proposal/m-p/1928570#M144139</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-18T23:03:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WCS proposal</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-proposal/m-p/1928571#M144140</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not much sure about the tracking, but you can take care of the bleeding from the first floor to the ground floor. As&amp;nbsp; long as the floor is thick enough, I dont think stacking will have much impact&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:10:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wcs-proposal/m-p/1928571#M144140</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikhilcherian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-18T23:10:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

