<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Over utilized APs in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437506#M14537</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys please have a look at the attached heatmap I have got two APs which are over utilized and the surrounding APs aren't connecting too many clients. Would you suggest the to relocate the surrounding APs around APs with 28 clients? if yes please suggest the location&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;alternatively can this be rectified by changing the Tx power of the surrounding APs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/media/heatm.png" class="migrated-markup-image" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fast5658659</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T07:37:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Over utilized APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437506#M14537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys please have a look at the attached heatmap I have got two APs which are over utilized and the surrounding APs aren't connecting too many clients. Would you suggest the to relocate the surrounding APs around APs with 28 clients? if yes please suggest the location&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;alternatively can this be rectified by changing the Tx power of the surrounding APs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/media/heatm.png" class="migrated-markup-image" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437506#M14537</guid>
      <dc:creator>fast5658659</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T07:37:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi there, Could you please</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437507#M14538</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please let me know how big your company? &amp;nbsp;there is any metal wall or any type of radio 2.4GHz can overlapping with your AP's ? &amp;nbsp;Also I like to know your AP model&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 02:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437507#M14538</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohabdel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T02:49:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I can see two APs with 28</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437508#M14539</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can see two APs with 28 clients and one AP with 23 clients. &amp;nbsp; Layout of the floor looks like a call-centre or a university ground. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, it's the wireless client which makes the FINAL decision to join which AP they want. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at the left AP, I can see the AP is in the middle of a classroom of some sort. &amp;nbsp;You may want to disable low-speed data rates from 1 Mbps to 11 Mbps. &amp;nbsp;Make 18 Mbps as Mandatory and the rest are Supported. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The right-hand AP looks like it is inadequate. &amp;nbsp;There are three APs above this one and they look like they are meant to provide wireless coverage to three large classrooms. &amp;nbsp;They are inadequate. &amp;nbsp;You may need to add one (or a total of two) per classroom or lecture theatre or hall. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AP on the right-hand with 28 clients is being "supported" by the AP to the left (2 clients) and above (5 clients). &amp;nbsp; Judging from the heat map, it shows the 28 client AP is doing all the heavy lifting. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you enable TPC and DCA on all the APs?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 03:11:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437508#M14539</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T03:11:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thanks Leo,I can see two APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437509#M14540</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Leo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see two APs with 28 clients and one AP with 23 clients. Layout of the floor looks like a call-centre or a university ground.&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;It's a office floor&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, it's the wireless client which makes the FINAL decision to join which AP they want.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at the left AP, I can see the AP is in the middle of a classroom of some sort. You may want to disable low-speed data rates from 1 Mbps to 11 Mbps. Make 18 Mbps as Mandatory and the rest are Supported.&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;Will that make any difference?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The right-hand AP looks like it is inadequate. There are three APs above this one and they look like they are meant to provide wireless coverage to three large classrooms. They are inadequate. You may need to add one (or a total of two) per classroom or lecture theatre or hall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AP on the right-hand with 28 clients is being "supported" by the AP to the left (2 clients) and above (5 clients). Judging from the heat map, it shows the 28 client AP is doing all the heavy lifting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;Correct not sure how to get the surrounding APs to share the load&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you enable TPC and DCA on all the APs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;It's enable for all APs but I have fixed tx power of some of the APs near the heavy loaded APs to increase their coverage area. But that hasn't helped much&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;Should we add more APs or adjust the existing ones?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 04:10:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437509#M14540</guid>
      <dc:creator>fast5658659</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T04:10:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi mohabde,There isn't any</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437510#M14541</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;SPAN class="fullname"&gt;&lt;SPAN rel="sioc:has_creator"&gt;&lt;A about="/users/mohabdel" class="username" datatype="" href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/users/mohabdel" property="foaf:name" title="View user profile." typeof="sioc:UserAccount" lang=""&gt;mohabde,&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="fullname"&gt;&lt;SPAN rel="sioc:has_creator"&gt;There isn't any metal thing near the ceiling. Our APs are all &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;AIR-CAP3502I-Q-K9&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 04:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437510#M14541</guid>
      <dc:creator>fast5658659</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T04:13:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Fast, How many AP do you</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437511#M14542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Fast,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many AP do you have? &amp;nbsp;Do you have wireless controller? &amp;nbsp;if there is no controller please add all APs in cluster mode. and this will resolve port of this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moh&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 04:53:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437511#M14542</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohabdel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T04:53:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi mohabdel, we have 29 APs</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437512#M14543</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi mohabdel, we have 29 APs and have 5508 WLC&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 04:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437512#M14543</guid>
      <dc:creator>fast5658659</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-07T04:55:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fast, 5508 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437513#M14544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fast,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5508 controller datasheet&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/5500-series-wireless-controllers/data_sheet_c78-521631.pdf&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AIR-CT5508-12-K9 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;WLC up to 12 Cisco aps&lt;BR /&gt;AIR-CT5508-25-K9 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;WLC up to 25 Cisco aps&lt;BR /&gt;AIR-CT5508-50-K9 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;WLC up to 50 Cisco aps&lt;BR /&gt;AIR-CT5508-100-K9 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;WLC up to 100 Cisco aps&lt;BR /&gt;AIR-CT5508-250-K9 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;WLC up to 250 Cisco aps&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;AIR-CT5508-500-K9 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;WLC up to 500 Cisco aps&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;AIR-CT5508-500-2PK WLC up to 500 Cisco aps&lt;BR /&gt;AIR-CT5508-HA-K9 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; WLC for High Availability&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;make sure your company WLC model can support more then 29 APs. &amp;nbsp;Also I did search on&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14px;"&gt;CAP3502 it is support 35 wireless host at same time. Also make sure WLC channels are fixed for each AP.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 14px;"&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 06:17:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/over-utilized-aps/m-p/2437513#M14544</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohabdel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-08T06:17:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

