<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Redundancy with 2 vWLC in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618722#M146557</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Forum,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is it possible to operate 2 vWLC (with version 8.0) and configure them to work redundant (in any mode A/A, A/P or cold stand-by) as you could with a 5500 WLC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alexander&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 09:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AllterraCCO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T09:41:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Redundancy with 2 vWLC</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618722#M146557</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Forum,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is it possible to operate 2 vWLC (with version 8.0) and configure them to work redundant (in any mode A/A, A/P or cold stand-by) as you could with a 5500 WLC?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alexander&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 09:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618722#M146557</guid>
      <dc:creator>AllterraCCO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T09:41:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi Alexander,Yes that is</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618723#M146558</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Alexander,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes that is possible, but not in an hitless fashion like SSO with the 5500 controllers. The access-points need to determine that their primary controller is down which will take at least 10~15 seconds (if you are going to use fast AP heartbeats). And all the clients need to re-authenticate. To answer your question; just configure an primary and secondary WLC on the access-point.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With the virtual WLC your access-points have to run in FlexConnect mode which has some drawbacks (just like the virtual WLC itself, comparing it to an physical WLC). But depending on your deployment, the virtual controller can be much cheaper and lift on the HA infrastructure in the already existing hypervisor layer in your datacenter.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is also possible to do "local authentication" on FlexConnect AP's when the connection to the controller has been lost, which can be handy when the WAN link is instable. Maybe this feature is an better solution that just add an second WLC in the datacenter far away.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618723#M146558</guid>
      <dc:creator>Freerk Terpstra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-11T20:29:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Yes, it is possible through</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618724#M146559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, it is possible through Cisco SSO( Stateful Switch Over). For deployment guide please refer to the link-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/7-5/High_Availability_DG.pdf&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618724#M146559</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abhishek Abhishek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-12T06:46:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This feature is only</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618725#M146560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This feature is only available on the physical WLC's, not the virtual.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/2618725#M146560</guid>
      <dc:creator>Freerk Terpstra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-12T13:31:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hi Alexander,Yes that is</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/4007556#M146561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;local authentication is&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;not supported with Flexconnect group.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 13:41:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/redundancy-with-2-vwlc/m-p/4007556#M146561</guid>
      <dc:creator>syedmansoorhyder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-07T13:41:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

