<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Radio Utilization and FCS Errors in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radio-utilization-and-fcs-errors/m-p/1764939#M150465</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/legacy/8/0/1/64108-Radio_utlization.png" alt="Radio_utlization.png" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" height="282" onclick="" width="831" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is an output from our Aruba Airwave server. I've been trying to reduce the constant radio utilization on some of our APs. I succesfully did it by disabling the 1 and 2Mb data rates on the APs. However, for some reason the FCS errors have gone up on all APs. Any ideas why? The graph on the left shows a drop in interference, so I would think the FCS errors would decrease.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ctcahoe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:54:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Radio Utilization and FCS Errors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radio-utilization-and-fcs-errors/m-p/1764939#M150465</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.cisco.com/legacyfs/online/legacy/8/0/1/64108-Radio_utlization.png" alt="Radio_utlization.png" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" height="282" onclick="" width="831" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is an output from our Aruba Airwave server. I've been trying to reduce the constant radio utilization on some of our APs. I succesfully did it by disabling the 1 and 2Mb data rates on the APs. However, for some reason the FCS errors have gone up on all APs. Any ideas why? The graph on the left shows a drop in interference, so I would think the FCS errors would decrease.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radio-utilization-and-fcs-errors/m-p/1764939#M150465</guid>
      <dc:creator>ctcahoe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:54:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Radio Utilization and FCS Errors</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radio-utilization-and-fcs-errors/m-p/1764940#M150466</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; On a good note, it looks like the drop in radio utilization translated to a significant throughput increase. On some of our APs, we are seeing a 100% increase in throughput speeds. This was using a 2.4Ghz N client with 20MHz channels connecting to an 1140 AP. I'm going to do a site-survey later on some of our 3500 APs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also temporarily disabled the 5.5 and 11 Mb speeds and saw another slight (20-30%) jump in throughput, but we aren't ready to kick 802.11b clients off the network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:29:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/radio-utilization-and-fcs-errors/m-p/1764940#M150466</guid>
      <dc:creator>ctcahoe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-12T15:29:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

