<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic wireless Ethernet collisions in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-ethernet-collisions/m-p/2908598#M151307</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What may prevent wireless users attending video conference from excessive segment/packet loss?&amp;nbsp; As of now when 4-5 attendees participating in a video conference, complain of bad reception.&amp;nbsp; What is to prevent collisions of segments during video transmission?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Said&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 11:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>saidfarah</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-05T11:57:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>wireless Ethernet collisions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-ethernet-collisions/m-p/2908598#M151307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What may prevent wireless users attending video conference from excessive segment/packet loss?&amp;nbsp; As of now when 4-5 attendees participating in a video conference, complain of bad reception.&amp;nbsp; What is to prevent collisions of segments during video transmission?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Said&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 11:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-ethernet-collisions/m-p/2908598#M151307</guid>
      <dc:creator>saidfarah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T11:57:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's no different to the</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-ethernet-collisions/m-p/2908599#M151308</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's no different to the requirement for RTP: &amp;nbsp;Co-Channel Interferrence, duty cycle, protocol, distance from the nearest AP, etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This happens if, for example, the video conferencing client is associated to 2.4 Ghz in a noisy environment. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:13:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-ethernet-collisions/m-p/2908599#M151308</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leo Laohoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-26T16:13:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>check list :</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-ethernet-collisions/m-p/2908600#M151309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;check list :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;RSSI &amp;gt; -67 ,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SNR &amp;gt; 25&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;no interference&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;no channel utilization ,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;WMM is enabled&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;encryption is AES&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;low data rates disabled .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;QoS profile of that WLAN is gold or platinum&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-ethernet-collisions/m-p/2908600#M151309</guid>
      <dc:creator>ali aqrabawi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-26T16:29:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

