<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Wireless Subnets in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-subnets/m-p/1637762#M153605</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the typical subnets for big wireless deployments? Right now we have 23 bits which is 255.255.254.0 510 host. We are planning bigger and thinking of going up to 2046 hosts per subnet. Do you think this is over kill? Right now we are using about 1/2 of the 510 host with A/G/N coming to place we might get more wireless devices out there in two years or so.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bauti1428</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:01:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless Subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-subnets/m-p/1637762#M153605</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the typical subnets for big wireless deployments? Right now we have 23 bits which is 255.255.254.0 510 host. We are planning bigger and thinking of going up to 2046 hosts per subnet. Do you think this is over kill? Right now we are using about 1/2 of the 510 host with A/G/N coming to place we might get more wireless devices out there in two years or so.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 03:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-subnets/m-p/1637762#M153605</guid>
      <dc:creator>bauti1428</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T03:01:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-subnets/m-p/1637763#M153606</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many host you have in your wireless network?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-subnets/m-p/1637763#M153606</guid>
      <dc:creator>bauti1428</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-31T15:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-subnets/m-p/1637764#M153607</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Instead of going with bigger subnets, you'd be bette served by making more, and utilizing the AP groups feature and breaking up the subnets that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;Steve&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If&amp;nbsp; this helps you and/or answers&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; your question please mark the question as "answered" and/or rate it, so&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; other users can easily find it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:58:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-subnets/m-p/1637764#M153607</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Rodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-31T15:58:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

