<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Dynamic routing protocols over wireless. in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/dynamic-routing-protocols-over-wireless/m-p/686764#M154656</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Are there any issues with running dynamic routing protocols through two access points (1240AG) bridging two LANs that are presumably currently setup with a dynamic routing protocol?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Patrick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 20:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>grapeola</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-04T20:07:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dynamic routing protocols over wireless.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/dynamic-routing-protocols-over-wireless/m-p/686764#M154656</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Are there any issues with running dynamic routing protocols through two access points (1240AG) bridging two LANs that are presumably currently setup with a dynamic routing protocol?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Patrick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 20:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/dynamic-routing-protocols-over-wireless/m-p/686764#M154656</guid>
      <dc:creator>grapeola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T20:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic routing protocols over wireless.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/dynamic-routing-protocols-over-wireless/m-p/686765#M154657</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There shouldn't be. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are acting as bridges ... so no need for a routing protocol in the common broadcast domain. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless you have some flavor of broadcast / multicast control in-place, it should pass the traffic without issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:58:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/dynamic-routing-protocols-over-wireless/m-p/686765#M154657</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottmac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-09-20T22:58:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

