<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wireless Location Accuracy in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-location-accuracy/m-p/506506#M154703</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using only a 2000 or 4400 controller without the location appliance the client is place on the map next to the AP it is associated with and not at the location the client actually was on the map.  This was not how the product was sold to us.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dulle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-06-30T00:12:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless Location Accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-location-accuracy/m-p/506504#M154701</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using the 2000 series or 4400 series location box, with a series of APs - whats the general accuracy for locating the APs or Tags ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Kelvin &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 19:18:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-location-accuracy/m-p/506504#M154701</guid>
      <dc:creator>kelvindam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-04T19:18:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Location Accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-location-accuracy/m-p/506505#M154702</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My sources say its about within 10 feet and shrinking as the technology advances.  I would love to see it get down below 1 foot.  That would really make things precise&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please remember to rate all replies&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:00:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-location-accuracy/m-p/506505#M154702</guid>
      <dc:creator>travis-dennis_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-09T12:00:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Location Accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-location-accuracy/m-p/506506#M154703</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using only a 2000 or 4400 controller without the location appliance the client is place on the map next to the AP it is associated with and not at the location the client actually was on the map.  This was not how the product was sold to us.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/wireless-location-accuracy/m-p/506506#M154703</guid>
      <dc:creator>dulle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-30T00:12:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

