<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic The second NIC isn't in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-3-0-ucs-secondary-nic-usage/m-p/3027748#M1597</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The second NIC isn't supported for anything right now. This has been asked in the past for Cisco to make use of it, but no luck.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-27T14:14:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Prime 3.0 UCS Secondary Nic usage</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-3-0-ucs-secondary-nic-usage/m-p/3027747#M1596</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have just installed a prime 3 UCS we have been using prime 2 in a virtual environment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One thing we can't figure out is how to set the second NIC of the UCS to work as part of an port channel group. we want this to allow for resilience if we have to work on the switch that the server is connected to.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is this possible?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If not is there anything the second Nic can be used for?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:44:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-3-0-ucs-secondary-nic-usage/m-p/3027747#M1596</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adam Watts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-05T13:44:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The second NIC isn't</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-3-0-ucs-secondary-nic-usage/m-p/3027748#M1597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The second NIC isn't supported for anything right now. This has been asked in the past for Cisco to make use of it, but no luck.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Scott&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** Please rate helpful posts ***&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-3-0-ucs-secondary-nic-usage/m-p/3027748#M1597</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott Fella</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-27T14:14:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Thank's Scott,</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-3-0-ucs-secondary-nic-usage/m-p/3027749#M1598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank's Scott,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Extremely disappointing that it can't be bonded, doesn't make for a resilient system.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:43:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/prime-3-0-ucs-secondary-nic-usage/m-p/3027749#M1598</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adam Watts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-27T14:43:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

