<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: issue containing a rogue AP in Wireless</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/issue-containing-a-rogue-ap/m-p/1040014#M16161</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check and verify that the "rogue" is not one of your APs associated to a controller with a different mobility group name but on the same network as your primary mobility group. This is the only way I could think that this is happeneing. Also, try a 4 AP containment. At 2 APs a client could still associate to the rogue thus generating a new alert.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dennischolmes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-24T19:23:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>issue containing a rogue AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/issue-containing-a-rogue-ap/m-p/1040013#M16160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My WLC has detected (via 15 detecting radios) a rogue AP with a client connected to it.  The infrastructure has not determined that the AP is plugged into the local network.  I'm trying to contain the AP - I classify it as "Malicious", update its status to "Contain" &amp;amp; assign 2 APs (though the number of APs don't matter here) to contain the rogue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything looks right, as the WLC shows that the rogue AP is in a "Contained" status.  However, after about a minute the WLC shows the rogue having been reverted to an "Alert" status.  I've contain other rogues before but have yet to see one not have the "Contained" status stick.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone seen this?  Or know why it's happening?  Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2021 23:22:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/issue-containing-a-rogue-ap/m-p/1040013#M16160</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccernivani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-03T23:22:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: issue containing a rogue AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/issue-containing-a-rogue-ap/m-p/1040014#M16161</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check and verify that the "rogue" is not one of your APs associated to a controller with a different mobility group name but on the same network as your primary mobility group. This is the only way I could think that this is happeneing. Also, try a 4 AP containment. At 2 APs a client could still associate to the rogue thus generating a new alert.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/issue-containing-a-rogue-ap/m-p/1040014#M16161</guid>
      <dc:creator>dennischolmes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-24T19:23:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: issue containing a rogue AP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/issue-containing-a-rogue-ap/m-p/1040015#M16162</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've tried all containing AP options - 1 thru 4.   Doesn't make a difference.  The AP goes into a "Contained" status for less than a minute then reverts to "Alert".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AP is definitely not ours.  I did an OUI look up and its MAC address pops up as an Apple device.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:31:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless/issue-containing-a-rogue-ap/m-p/1040015#M16162</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccernivani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-24T19:31:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

